Have you? He expressed quite plainly that he felt that he did not have unilateral authority to invalidate votes. According to the powers granted to the office of the Vice President by the Twelfth Amendment, that is, in fact, true.
You're an idiot. The point is that "dead ink on paper" is not a valid argument. You can't complain about the law being broken and then turn around and suggest breaking the law. It wouldn't have solved our problem at all. Pence invalidating votes would've been ruled against as having "no standing" (and this time SCOTUS would've been correct) and we'd be right where we are now.
Ruels are not magically invalidated simply because they were written by dead men. You save nothing by breaking the rules. If anything, all that would've happened is that he would've made the case for the people that actually stole the election. They spent years hyping up the "Trump is a tyrant" line, complete with calls for the military to remove him from the White House.
Again, if you're going to beef with Pence over "ink", then you should have the same problem with Trump. Why didn't he invoke the Insurrection Act?
When did you complain? Are you seriously this stupid? Your entire response history to me has been nothing but complaints about the law being broken.
"The nation was seized by evil because muh constitution"
There's at least one example right there in the last line of your most recent response.
"We'll never get a chance to know"
Such a dickless cop-out. We saw SCOTUS do it more than once, so there's zero reason to think it would've been any different.
That isn't the problem at all. If you think it's "Constitution or nation", you're the problem.
So I guess gun confiscation is alright because of some "dead ink on paper"? Fantastic logic there fucko.
If that's how you want to play it, are you mad at Trump for not invoking the Insurrection Act?
Have you? He expressed quite plainly that he felt that he did not have unilateral authority to invalidate votes. According to the powers granted to the office of the Vice President by the Twelfth Amendment, that is, in fact, true.
You're an idiot. The point is that "dead ink on paper" is not a valid argument. You can't complain about the law being broken and then turn around and suggest breaking the law. It wouldn't have solved our problem at all. Pence invalidating votes would've been ruled against as having "no standing" (and this time SCOTUS would've been correct) and we'd be right where we are now.
Ruels are not magically invalidated simply because they were written by dead men. You save nothing by breaking the rules. If anything, all that would've happened is that he would've made the case for the people that actually stole the election. They spent years hyping up the "Trump is a tyrant" line, complete with calls for the military to remove him from the White House.
Again, if you're going to beef with Pence over "ink", then you should have the same problem with Trump. Why didn't he invoke the Insurrection Act?
When did you complain? Are you seriously this stupid? Your entire response history to me has been nothing but complaints about the law being broken.
"The nation was seized by evil because muh constitution"
There's at least one example right there in the last line of your most recent response.
"We'll never get a chance to know"
Such a dickless cop-out. We saw SCOTUS do it more than once, so there's zero reason to think it would've been any different.