911
Comments (85)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
DavidBowieRapedKids 7 points ago +16 / -9

People (me included) have been calling the Q shit a LARP since day 1.

Here's some advice, if predictions read like a fortune cookie they're 100% bullshit.

Use the biblical standard for prophets. If they're wrong once they're not a prophet.

5
2820928 5 points ago +12 / -7

I agree that there are some anons who LARP, but not Q.

"QAnon" is a fake term used by fake news to lump Q and Anons into the same level - like we're the same source, nobody in the community uses that term unironically. (Invented by fake news)

Q is the primary source for military intel drops, Anons are secondary at best.

Your comment is the equivalent of saying "God isn't real" because a human author (secondary source) wrote using their own words a teaching deemed to be incorrect (Illogical).

Q is a psyop... against the deep state - every date we are hoping for has been pre-planned for specific reasons. It is to distract them from white hat operations, and make them crap their pants, and reveal all of their best strategies, and every last bunker and safe house they have.

There is no plan. It is adapting. Q's primary strategy appears to be exhausting each and every one of the deep states plans. Once every one of them which have even a remote chance of success are exhausted - then the indictments, arrests, etc. will happen. There are 7,000 sealed indictments so far.

Also 1,200 CEO's have stepped down or have agreed to do so this year.. reasons such as "covid, family issues, etc."

4
magacoder 4 points ago +5 / -1

Q just mixes in various facts with LARP and you eat it up.

He's been wrong multiple times and yet you keep going.

1
2820928 1 point ago +2 / -1

Q hasn't been wrong. Anons have been wrong. Not the same thing.

It's like saying "x" pastor was wrong, therefore Jesus is wrong. (Illogical).

Not comparing Q to Jesus, just the metaphor that sticks out as many on here are Christian like myself. Q (Military Intelligence group of multiple people serves the public). But the "teachings" or knowledge has not been disproven, similar to everything Christ has said.

Attack the messenger = Fallacy.

2
NotAQTardFgtt 2 points ago +4 / -2

Jesus Christ listen to yourself. Fucking delusional cultists

0
2820928 0 points ago +3 / -3

"cultists". That's something libtard shills call Christians, and Trump supporters, and anons who believe in Q, by the way. They also like taking our Lord's name in vain (Especially when pretending to be a Christian online) and cussing - a lot. A lot of cussing.

I looked at your recent comments and you're talking about 2024 and stuff. Lame.

Pro-tip, when your arguments require profanity - they're not arguments, they're groundless 'REEEE-style' complaints.

0
NotAQTardFgtt 0 points ago +1 / -1

So first it was supposed to be the 6th, then Inauguration Day, then the “real Inauguration Day March 4th”, now it’s what? How many times you dumb fucks going to let your cult leader move those goalposts on you and you take the full load right in your mouth?

R-E-T-A-R-D-E-D

1
DavidBowieRapedKids 1 point ago +2 / -1

"Trust Sessions."

0
2820928 0 points ago +1 / -1

What drop was that? There's something called quoting, and something called referencing.

Without them your paraphrased mistruths are very obvious.

1
DavidBowieRapedKids 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q was telling people to trust Jeff Sessions. It was all over TD back when it was on reddit.

If this concerns you maybe you should look into it in an attempt to prove me wrong.

I'm not spending any energy on Q bullshit. It has done nothing but harm and some nerd (Q himself) is sitting in his room somewhere jacking off because of all the attention.

Have fun.

3
arebee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Q has been for retards since day 1. These idiots won’t let it go too.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
arebee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Q is to derail knowing the truth.

0
basedbusdriver 0 points ago +1 / -1

People go out of their way to trash Q supporters. Not necessary. I support free speech even speech I don't agree with or find suspect.

2
DavidBowieRapedKids 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you though my comment was "trashing" anyone you seriously need to develop a thicker skin.

I'm not trashing anyone in that comment. I'm making reasonable points.

I am however trashing this other particular supporter because he's trying to convince me that "trust Sessions" was justified and accurate.

I treat SJWs, Commies, and any other delusional group the exact same way.