First off, he reads a script, he has very few opportunities to voice his personal opinion, especially since 2019, when he stopped doing those 1 on 1 Debates.
But if I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times, he reads a Script, and is NEVER LIVE.
That makes it better how? He wasn't reading a script when he was rude & demanding to Sidney Powell. He is one of those people who doesn't think Americans are capable of BIG, terrible things because 'America'. Could have, at the very least, covered the witness testimonies in Michigan. Highly compelling. One guy was a former state legislator. Could have had him on to talk about the lack of oversight, etc. Nothing.
Tucker was the ONLY msm host I paid any attention to (apart from cringe watching others) since the 'can't cuck the Tuck' videos got big on YouTube. I LOVED TUCKER.
Have not watched him once since his monologue about trees and the beauty of America right after the election. If you are not going to report on the things your audience is deeply concerned with, then you don't deserve them.
You shouldn't buy into Sidney Powell, she is a grifter according to some, but I personally believe they have recieved bad information and evidence, and are "In too Deep", but we'll see.
He has always said there has been Dead Voters, Multi-Voters, and Flat-Out Fraud in some states.
I support him more than most here, but what you're saying is untrue. I've seen Crowder and others talk about how the reason they enjoyed working on Fox News is that they weren't told what to say. In fact I think I've heard Tucker say it.
He's clearly not just a newsreader, he does have a hell of a lot of editorial control. Of course he reads a script (who ever doubted this? Absurd strawman), but he writes it too. Otherwise why would he be saying something that is largely different than other personalities at Fox? Why would people here have liked him more than anyone else there (prior to the election, of course). He made a point of disparaging Sydney Powell and trying to gaslight us all.
Again, nobody has ever doubted that things there aren't scripted. You're making a ridiculous strawman. But the existence of a script doesn't mean you have no editorial control over it.
Agreed. But that doesn't mean he gets to decide if he presents "Case Breaking" Evidence of Dominion Voter Fraud (Which probably doesn't exist, if the Machines are connecting to the Internet, that shit was probably wiped clean the day the Steal was complete)
Yeah for me it was much later, when Crowder talked about his experiences with him. He's right about a lot of things, but definitely an elitist who believes he's among a higher class of people.
Stop lying and making shit up you have absolutely no evidence to suoport your claim. We all saw what the traitorous Cuck did and how he brags that Faux had never censored him. You're a pathetic SIMP.
First off, he reads a script, he has very few opportunities to voice his personal opinion, especially since 2019, when he stopped doing those 1 on 1 Debates.
But if I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times, he reads a Script, and is NEVER LIVE.
That makes it better how? He wasn't reading a script when he was rude & demanding to Sidney Powell. He is one of those people who doesn't think Americans are capable of BIG, terrible things because 'America'. Could have, at the very least, covered the witness testimonies in Michigan. Highly compelling. One guy was a former state legislator. Could have had him on to talk about the lack of oversight, etc. Nothing.
Tucker was the ONLY msm host I paid any attention to (apart from cringe watching others) since the 'can't cuck the Tuck' videos got big on YouTube. I LOVED TUCKER.
Have not watched him once since his monologue about trees and the beauty of America right after the election. If you are not going to report on the things your audience is deeply concerned with, then you don't deserve them.
You can't claim our "allies" were in on the steal and NOT, bring receipts, you just can't.
And I haven't watched him since November, I just don't like seeing people dog piling on the Hate Train, and quite possibly eating one of our own.
But Tucker proved he is not part of the group when he tried to gaslight the group to believe the no fraud lies because he was personally benefiting.
You shouldn't buy into Sidney Powell, she is a grifter according to some, but I personally believe they have recieved bad information and evidence, and are "In too Deep", but we'll see.
He has always said there has been Dead Voters, Multi-Voters, and Flat-Out Fraud in some states.
I support him more than most here, but what you're saying is untrue. I've seen Crowder and others talk about how the reason they enjoyed working on Fox News is that they weren't told what to say. In fact I think I've heard Tucker say it.
He's clearly not just a newsreader, he does have a hell of a lot of editorial control. Of course he reads a script (who ever doubted this? Absurd strawman), but he writes it too. Otherwise why would he be saying something that is largely different than other personalities at Fox? Why would people here have liked him more than anyone else there (prior to the election, of course). He made a point of disparaging Sydney Powell and trying to gaslight us all.
Things have changed at Fox News in the past 3 or 4 years. Notice Tucker Carlson stopped doing those Live Interviews with Democrats back in 2019?
Shit is changing there, they're becoming CNN or MSNBC.
Very little is Live anymore, on really any TV Channel, there is a 5 to 10 minute delay usually (if not all pre-recorded), use to be 30 seconds.
Again, nobody has ever doubted that things there aren't scripted. You're making a ridiculous strawman. But the existence of a script doesn't mean you have no editorial control over it.
Agreed. But that doesn't mean he gets to decide if he presents "Case Breaking" Evidence of Dominion Voter Fraud (Which probably doesn't exist, if the Machines are connecting to the Internet, that shit was probably wiped clean the day the Steal was complete)
Anaconda took the veil off my Tucker exception when he posted this article from 2018. You will see what an insider he is and how much derision he has for Trump. He says the elite should rule, among other things. If you have a few minutes, worth a read. https://www.weltwoche.ch/ausgaben/2018-49/weltwoche-international/trump-is-not-capable-die-weltwoche-ausgabe-49-2018.html
Yeah for me it was much later, when Crowder talked about his experiences with him. He's right about a lot of things, but definitely an elitist who believes he's among a higher class of people.
Stop lying and making shit up you have absolutely no evidence to suoport your claim. We all saw what the traitorous Cuck did and how he brags that Faux had never censored him. You're a pathetic SIMP.