I support him more than most here, but what you're saying is untrue. I've seen Crowder and others talk about how the reason they enjoyed working on Fox News is that they weren't told what to say. In fact I think I've heard Tucker say it.
He's clearly not just a newsreader, he does have a hell of a lot of editorial control. Of course he reads a script (who ever doubted this? Absurd strawman), but he writes it too. Otherwise why would he be saying something that is largely different than other personalities at Fox? Why would people here have liked him more than anyone else there (prior to the election, of course). He made a point of disparaging Sydney Powell and trying to gaslight us all.
Again, nobody has ever doubted that things there aren't scripted. You're making a ridiculous strawman. But the existence of a script doesn't mean you have no editorial control over it.
Agreed. But that doesn't mean he gets to decide if he presents "Case Breaking" Evidence of Dominion Voter Fraud (Which probably doesn't exist, if the Machines are connecting to the Internet, that shit was probably wiped clean the day the Steal was complete)
That isn't what people here are saying. Nobody said he had case-breaking evidence and withheld it. He lied about Powell and used it to gaslight everybody.
Yeah for me it was much later, when Crowder talked about his experiences with him. He's right about a lot of things, but definitely an elitist who believes he's among a higher class of people.
I support him more than most here, but what you're saying is untrue. I've seen Crowder and others talk about how the reason they enjoyed working on Fox News is that they weren't told what to say. In fact I think I've heard Tucker say it.
He's clearly not just a newsreader, he does have a hell of a lot of editorial control. Of course he reads a script (who ever doubted this? Absurd strawman), but he writes it too. Otherwise why would he be saying something that is largely different than other personalities at Fox? Why would people here have liked him more than anyone else there (prior to the election, of course). He made a point of disparaging Sydney Powell and trying to gaslight us all.
Things have changed at Fox News in the past 3 or 4 years. Notice Tucker Carlson stopped doing those Live Interviews with Democrats back in 2019?
Shit is changing there, they're becoming CNN or MSNBC.
Very little is Live anymore, on really any TV Channel, there is a 5 to 10 minute delay usually (if not all pre-recorded), use to be 30 seconds.
Again, nobody has ever doubted that things there aren't scripted. You're making a ridiculous strawman. But the existence of a script doesn't mean you have no editorial control over it.
Agreed. But that doesn't mean he gets to decide if he presents "Case Breaking" Evidence of Dominion Voter Fraud (Which probably doesn't exist, if the Machines are connecting to the Internet, that shit was probably wiped clean the day the Steal was complete)
That isn't what people here are saying. Nobody said he had case-breaking evidence and withheld it. He lied about Powell and used it to gaslight everybody.
Anaconda took the veil off my Tucker exception when he posted this article from 2018. You will see what an insider he is and how much derision he has for Trump. He says the elite should rule, among other things. If you have a few minutes, worth a read. https://www.weltwoche.ch/ausgaben/2018-49/weltwoche-international/trump-is-not-capable-die-weltwoche-ausgabe-49-2018.html
Yeah for me it was much later, when Crowder talked about his experiences with him. He's right about a lot of things, but definitely an elitist who believes he's among a higher class of people.