3479
Comments (493)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
46
deleted 46 points ago +47 / -1
7
AJoeDD 7 points ago +7 / -0

The rotten food could be carelessness. The metal is much less likely. Having both happen repeatedly is likely to be intentional.

Food providers certainly have service contracts that must be upheld, and FDA law. This is lawsuit material, and revocation of license material. No way these can pass. There has to be action on this. If not, then we can add this is intentionally endorsed or permitted by the higher ups who refuse to take action.

7
Kingoftheroad 7 points ago +7 / -0

None of it is carelessness. Don't be foolish and blind. We know none of it is accidental after it's happened repeatedly and after the metal in the food. Also remember the cops food being tampered with a couple years ago? This is happening to many times, on too large a scale, in different ways (cops, now no, the sleeping arrangements, etc.) to be a mistake.

4
AJoeDD 4 points ago +4 / -0

I only said it's possible to be a mistake. I don't think it's an accident. With regard to getting the investigation process going, someone might look at it and say it's a few pictures that were found by chance, etc. Technically, that's true, but I don't believe it is given the patterns. Patterns aren't persuasive to outsiders though.

The best thing to do would be to investigate forensically and find the people responsible for those batches, and demand investigations of the provider. That will probably depend on the guardsmen and their higherups to actually launch the investigation. Alternatively, I think an individual guardsmen can do a civil suit, right? The same way any civilian could sue McDonald's if they had deliberate food poisoning.

The big question is what is the NG doing about it right now? If they're not investigating they're just as bad as the people poisoning the food.