Yes. And some luck with SCOTUS downstream. We should assume the worst and act accordingly. We may not be able to win the battle against the media complex and the vote theft. We can work to marginalize and eliminate them from our system. I know this can work but only because we are the majority and they are a handful of corporations, and their puppets in .gov.
Were in the middle of a war, they don’t follow the rules anyway so what does it matter if they change them?
Talking about “elections” is accepting the premise that we have a say in how we are governed, and that the results of the last sham election should stand so that if we win the next sham election ours will stand.
Doesn't it still have to pass the Senate though?
Lol what senate the democrats can pass what ever they want
Apparently, they're going to change the Senate rules, again, in order to pass this with a simple majority . . .
States need to fight this with their own laws . . .
Yes. And some luck with SCOTUS downstream. We should assume the worst and act accordingly. We may not be able to win the battle against the media complex and the vote theft. We can work to marginalize and eliminate them from our system. I know this can work but only because we are the majority and they are a handful of corporations, and their puppets in .gov.
What's the source on this? I feel like if this passes there will be a war.
Were in the middle of a war, they don’t follow the rules anyway so what does it matter if they change them?
Talking about “elections” is accepting the premise that we have a say in how we are governed, and that the results of the last sham election should stand so that if we win the next sham election ours will stand.