That is not the correct interpretation once you account for national elections and damages to other states via the mishandling of one states' elections.
Yes, I know that's the angle the states were going for. I thought the Supreme Court should have, at least, heard the case based on that logic.
That the left-leaning states argued for "states' rights" (which I am almost always for) and then, six weeks later, their representatives want the Feds to run roughshod over those very same rights is another flashpoint of leftist hypocrisy. The only thing the left is logically consistent on is their lust for power over others.
That is not the correct interpretation once you account for national elections and damages to other states via the mishandling of one states' elections.
Yes, I know that's the angle the states were going for. I thought the Supreme Court should have, at least, heard the case based on that logic.
That the left-leaning states argued for "states' rights" (which I am almost always for) and then, six weeks later, their representatives want the Feds to run roughshod over those very same rights is another flashpoint of leftist hypocrisy. The only thing the left is logically consistent on is their lust for power over others.
And degeneracy. They've always been consistent there.