Guy was down on his luck, had health problems, was close to being homeless, felt bad for the guy. Anyways he said social security was messed up cause the government didn't do it right and he said "Cause the orange clown changed it"

One reply was "Why make it political?' Another reply was "Cause politics drive policies, and we all know conservative states aren't great with social services."

Social security isn't really a social service, right? The money you have in social security is YOUR money, it's not coming all from taxpayers like welfare, or whatever is, right?

But my red-pill reply was;

"It wouldn't have been too political if he would have left out "orange man." We all know I'd get banned if I called 44 "Black clown" or if I call the current POTATUS "Dementia-in-Chief" or "Beijing Joe."

Regardless of your politics, you cannot tell me 46* loves this country more than 45. 46* has already destroyed thousands of jobs. the Keystone Pipeline was far more environmentally safe than moving our oil by TRUCKS across the US. Very little risk of leak, and it would have put less vehicles on the road. Warren Buffett owns the railroads and pretty sure they gave 46* campaign money, so he's re-paying them, and probably getting a little on the side.

Guys like 46* are the reason the government is corrupt, guys like 45 are the reason we know about it. I ain't saying 45 was perfect, but he did everything he could to help everyone, all while being called a xenophobe, and a dictator, while 46* is actually exhibiting dictator like qualities, and being an Americanphobe. Have you seen DC lately? I'd rather have someone who "hated" foreigners and loved Americans, and wanted to help Americans first, as President of the USA, than I would someone who does everything he can to help foreigners before even trying to help Americans. If you live in America, AMERICA FIRST shouldn't be an issue. You should always want to put your nation and your people first. Every other nation can put their people first, but America can't?

And btw, no, 45 didn't "incite" a "insurrection" cause 1) No one was armed, what kind of idiots try an insurrection unarmed? and 2) People were already at the capital building trying to get in long before he even came to speak.

The first guy arrested in the "insurrection" was a guy from Utah, who had been arrested numerous times for organizing riots in Utah related to the summer riots. Meanwhile, during said summer riots, various left wing leaders told them to not stop and to make their voices heard.

On Jan 6th, it was a handful of people. Out of that handful of people, a smaller handful actually destroyed property and stole things, most in the Capitol, stayed within the velvet ropes. During the summer, a group of people burnt and looted, but it happened on many many many instances.

1 incident involving maybe 15 bad guys, apparently is the worst thing since 9/11 and Pearl harbor, but 20+ incidents, involving 25-40 people each, looting and burning down buildings=totally okay fine protest. It was all over a lie anyway. He didn't die of police brutality, it was a fentanyl OD.

The media believes most Americans are idiots who will believe most of what they say, and you're proving them right. Watch the news, but don't take everything they say as 100% truth cause a good amount of it is exaggerated, and some of it is 100% false and some of it is truth and a lot of it is pure propaganda.

There are 2 things the left is best at, being offended/victimized, and gaslighting. Those 2 are slightly about election rigging, and defending China's propaganda.

Probably not the best red-pill, but it's something. I'm sure I'll be banned in a few minutes. I don't really care, nearly every forum I'm on these days turn into leftist-circle jerks who get pissed if you want to get back on topic about what was being talked about before it became political.