Too vague. We live in an era where "speech is violence," so they'd still probably remove Trump's speech by claiming it's "inciting violence." Better verbiage would be something like "no graphic depictions of violence" or, better, "no depictions or actions involving gore."
Too vague. We live in an era where "speech is violence," so they'd still probably remove Trump's speech by claiming it's "inciting violence." Better verbiage would be something like "no graphic depictions of violence" or, better, "no depictions or actions involving gore."
you're right...
as long as its no gore.
By "Gore", you mean "Al Gore", right?
The guy that went from $1.7million net worth to $300-350million in the span of ~20 years with the climate change hoax? If so then yes.