It was never proven that there were “extra ballots” and it was never proven that the software miscounted the votes. People just repeat these talking points because it’s more in line with how you traditionally think of “rigging an election.”
Why not just stick to what you can prove?
the covid scamdemic -> governors change voting rules / make voter fraud easy
governors kill nursing home patients -> media maliciously blames Trump
lockdowns to kill Trump’s economy
race war -> BLM poll workers take over polling stations to fight “voter suppression” -> mail in ballots are automatically counted regardless of if they’re invalid
lock braindead candidate in basemen -> completely rigged media covers for him
fake polls
media prematurely claims it’s over -> big tech censors anyone who disagrees -> lawmakers use big tech censorship as justification for arresting “insurrectionists” who protest the election
All of this is election stealing. It’s more than enough to delegitimize the election. And it’s all easily proven. There’s no need to bring up unproven stuff about dominion.
My proof/evidence is the intensity in which they resist any investigation or legitimate audit. As well as their concealment/destruction of evidence. There is a reason destruction and concealment of evidence is a crime itself and can be used as evidence of the crime in court.
The idea that anyone would allow computers to count and tally votes and take the number they spit out on pure faith of the company that runs them is absolutely absurd and should raise the hairs on the back of the neck if anyone who understands how computers fundamentally work. It is trivial to program a computer to behave one way all the time, and then a completely other way on just one particular day. It is also trivial to have that computer then erase those single-day instructions after executing them. Anybody remember the Volkswagen emissions cheating scandal?
Any institution that uses electronic vote counting absolutely must set it up in a way that a full independent audit comes as part of the package and can be triggered by any protest by an interested party. Pay the money to buy control of the source code or tell the company to F-off
you are just clueless, I worked with people that proved fraud dating all the way back to before 2012 with Diebold, now named Dominion, They had to change their name since people were after them with lawsuits due to the fraud in the 2012 GOP primaries against Dr. Ron Paul. I worked on his campaign. They never changed up the scheme, using the same vote flipping algo's, and fractional voting. 1.25. for biden, and .75 for Trump, just depends on the county, Some Either automatically gave Biden an additional number of votes, say 300 in NH, which the AG is currently looking into, or a few thousand for all candidates in AZ, and in other counties where they had to actually explain the GLITCH, such as the vote flip in Antrim county which was discovered. Anyway, but yeah, you say there is no proof which is either ignorant, disingenuous, or straight up shilling. I submit to you the following documents
This. It wasn't dominion as the qtards say...they don't NEED ANY software to cheat at all. They have all they need to cheat with mail-in ballots.
They didn't purge voter rolls, so dead/moved voters stayed on, sent mail ballots to everyone with no ID and no application needed so anybody could vote regardless of legal to vote or not, legalized ballot harvesting so people could come and "collect" ballots, and got rid of the signature verification.
Remember Trump won the 3 swing states last time by only 20-80k votes (WI, MI, PA). They just needed those 3 to win (279JB/259DT). Go around to a couple neighborhoods in big cities, and you can EASILY get 20-80k votes with mail-in ballots and harvesting by getting votes from people who can't legally vote (not registered, no address, not legal??). Veritas literally showed how they went to senior centers and harvested hundreds of votes a day by telling 90 yr old grandmas to just "check this box right here, he's a good candidate."
Then they just shut off signature verification so what would be an insurmountable lead usually with signature verification for DJT was overcome by Biden using a suspiciously unusual amount of harvested mail-in ballots.
Stop focusing on unprovable dominion stuff, and just focus on this. It will make the case better to normies.
It was never proven that there were “extra ballots” and it was never proven that the software miscounted the votes. People just repeat these talking points because it’s more in line with how you traditionally think of “rigging an election.”
Why not just stick to what you can prove?
All of this is election stealing. It’s more than enough to delegitimize the election. And it’s all easily proven. There’s no need to bring up unproven stuff about dominion.
Another thing missed in your list
My proof/evidence is the intensity in which they resist any investigation or legitimate audit. As well as their concealment/destruction of evidence. There is a reason destruction and concealment of evidence is a crime itself and can be used as evidence of the crime in court.
The idea that anyone would allow computers to count and tally votes and take the number they spit out on pure faith of the company that runs them is absolutely absurd and should raise the hairs on the back of the neck if anyone who understands how computers fundamentally work. It is trivial to program a computer to behave one way all the time, and then a completely other way on just one particular day. It is also trivial to have that computer then erase those single-day instructions after executing them. Anybody remember the Volkswagen emissions cheating scandal?
Any institution that uses electronic vote counting absolutely must set it up in a way that a full independent audit comes as part of the package and can be triggered by any protest by an interested party. Pay the money to buy control of the source code or tell the company to F-off
Dr Shiva among countless other data statisticians proved algo vote flipping you dumb ass, https://patriots.win/p/12hRj8ueXr/maricopa-county-the-code-which-s/
This isn’t proof. You’re just naive.
you are just clueless, I worked with people that proved fraud dating all the way back to before 2012 with Diebold, now named Dominion, They had to change their name since people were after them with lawsuits due to the fraud in the 2012 GOP primaries against Dr. Ron Paul. I worked on his campaign. They never changed up the scheme, using the same vote flipping algo's, and fractional voting. 1.25. for biden, and .75 for Trump, just depends on the county, Some Either automatically gave Biden an additional number of votes, say 300 in NH, which the AG is currently looking into, or a few thousand for all candidates in AZ, and in other counties where they had to actually explain the GLITCH, such as the vote flip in Antrim county which was discovered. Anyway, but yeah, you say there is no proof which is either ignorant, disingenuous, or straight up shilling. I submit to you the following documents
https://docs.google.com/file/edit?id=0ByJAC-sfXwumZzI2bVlON2VTMnFyYVZZSnpDYnNyQQ&pli=1
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByJAC-sfXwumdkE4d0Y2eWtURTZ2eDM5RmlLc3ZhQQ/edit?pli=1
This. It wasn't dominion as the qtards say...they don't NEED ANY software to cheat at all. They have all they need to cheat with mail-in ballots.
They didn't purge voter rolls, so dead/moved voters stayed on, sent mail ballots to everyone with no ID and no application needed so anybody could vote regardless of legal to vote or not, legalized ballot harvesting so people could come and "collect" ballots, and got rid of the signature verification.
Remember Trump won the 3 swing states last time by only 20-80k votes (WI, MI, PA). They just needed those 3 to win (279JB/259DT). Go around to a couple neighborhoods in big cities, and you can EASILY get 20-80k votes with mail-in ballots and harvesting by getting votes from people who can't legally vote (not registered, no address, not legal??). Veritas literally showed how they went to senior centers and harvested hundreds of votes a day by telling 90 yr old grandmas to just "check this box right here, he's a good candidate."
Then they just shut off signature verification so what would be an insurmountable lead usually with signature verification for DJT was overcome by Biden using a suspiciously unusual amount of harvested mail-in ballots.
Stop focusing on unprovable dominion stuff, and just focus on this. It will make the case better to normies.