Really, why don’t you answer the question before you: are you against secession or not? I understand you did not “champion” it but is it something you are in favor of or not?
And yet again you continue lying, deceiving, misrepresenting, etc. to the extreme among other tactics and tricks, shill account. You aren't the slightest bit sincere in any way whatsoever, neither in your questions nor reg. the debate, and you are fully aware of that. Again, since it is fully relevant given your shill comments:
And what about the site I linked to that is linked by Infowars and is not hosted on infowars.com?
Yet I did not as such champion secession (as you the troll/shill account "Finito" claimed in https://patriots.win/p/12hkYViibw/x/c/4DyLeZyxSJY ). Are you distracting and misrepresenting on purpose?
And the Infowars article is correct reg. at least some parts (and they link to primary sources even), see for instance https://archive.li/REvKC :
I don’t really understand you. Your odd abbreviations and citing are difficult to read. And your penchant for twisting a question to you as somehow deceiving and insincere is confusing.
Maybe you’re right, maybe secession might make some sense after all.
You aren't putting effort into your shilling. And yet again as before you continue lying, deceiving, misrepresenting, manipulating, etc. to the extreme among other tactics and tricks, shill account. You aren't the slightest bit sincere in any way whatsoever, neither in your questions nor reg. the debate, and you are fully aware of that. Again, since it is fully relevant given your shill comments:
And what about the site I linked to that is linked by Infowars and is not hosted on infowars.com?
Yet I did not as such champion secession (as you the troll/shill account "Finito" claimed in https://patriots.win/p/12hkYViibw/x/c/4DyLeZyxSJY ). Are you distracting and misrepresenting on purpose?
And the Infowars article is correct reg. at least some parts (and they link to primary sources even), see for instance https://archive.li/REvKC :
Another duck and deflect job by you. Wonderful.
I will waste no more of my time with you, as you are clearly afraid to take a position on a simple question.
Really, why don’t you answer the question before you: are you against secession or not? I understand you did not “champion” it but is it something you are in favor of or not?
And yet again you continue lying, deceiving, misrepresenting, etc. to the extreme among other tactics and tricks, shill account. You aren't the slightest bit sincere in any way whatsoever, neither in your questions nor reg. the debate, and you are fully aware of that. Again, since it is fully relevant given your shill comments:
And what about the site I linked to that is linked by Infowars and is not hosted on infowars.com?
Yet I did not as such champion secession (as you the troll/shill account "Finito" claimed in https://patriots.win/p/12hkYViibw/x/c/4DyLeZyxSJY ). Are you distracting and misrepresenting on purpose?
And the Infowars article is correct reg. at least some parts (and they link to primary sources even), see for instance https://archive.li/REvKC :
I don’t really understand you. Your odd abbreviations and citing are difficult to read. And your penchant for twisting a question to you as somehow deceiving and insincere is confusing.
Maybe you’re right, maybe secession might make some sense after all.
You aren't putting effort into your shilling. And yet again as before you continue lying, deceiving, misrepresenting, manipulating, etc. to the extreme among other tactics and tricks, shill account. You aren't the slightest bit sincere in any way whatsoever, neither in your questions nor reg. the debate, and you are fully aware of that. Again, since it is fully relevant given your shill comments:
And what about the site I linked to that is linked by Infowars and is not hosted on infowars.com?
Yet I did not as such champion secession (as you the troll/shill account "Finito" claimed in https://patriots.win/p/12hkYViibw/x/c/4DyLeZyxSJY ). Are you distracting and misrepresenting on purpose?
And the Infowars article is correct reg. at least some parts (and they link to primary sources even), see for instance https://archive.li/REvKC :
Another duck and deflect job by you. Wonderful. I will waste no more of my time with you, as you are clearly afraid to take a position on a simple question.