1253
Comments (79)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
52
Gopher 52 points ago +53 / -1

So Roberts followed the law on one that is a nice change.

31
the_sky_is_falling 31 points ago +31 / -0

This isn't exactly following the law.

Its says illegals convicted of crime have to be deported.

But coming into the country illegally is a crime.

That would mean every single illegal alien needs to be deported.

How much you wanna bet that is not the way the SC sees it?

19
unashamed 19 points ago +19 / -0

That is **if we convict. But if we just let you go to roam the country while awaiting court, you assume a new name, work under the table, and don’t come back, then who are we to...judge (ba-dum tiss)

13
anotherthing 13 points ago +13 / -0

This is the loop hole. Even if they come back to court, which is unlikely, liberal judges in liberal courts can easily change the verdict of the jury in order to keep them here. There won't be much outrage if the media doesn't cover it. Not to mention, how many stories have you seen over the last few years where the liberal father forgives the illegal alien for killing his wife/daughter?

1
Gopher 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree they will not, but should.

-39
Anaconda -39 points ago +8 / -47

fuck all 9 of the justices. even thomas and alito said 'no relief shall be granted' in the dec 2020 bullshit tx ruling

52
giantrabbit1 [S] 52 points ago +55 / -3

Fake news. Thomas dissented. He wrote the dissent that said how the others were basically full of shit.

16
HockeyMom4Trump 16 points ago +16 / -0

Alito also dissented

2
SnowflakeJuice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty sure if the only 2 of them should not have been impeached if they were on the Supreme Court 200 years ago are Thomas and Alito

15
JustifiedTrumpian 15 points ago +15 / -0

This

8
StepItUp 8 points ago +8 / -0

pretty sure they said they wouldn't grant relief but thomas wanted to hear the case, probably for future precedence as her reiterated again in his recent dissent on PA, but yeah, it would be nice if Thomas were the most left learning justice on the court.

4
peltast 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dang! That means, not only 'Fake News', but, a downright falsehood. Or lie?

4
medicpatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not everyone who dissents will write a dissenting opinions

6
RuleoVicus 6 points ago +7 / -1

Idiot.

5
JimmyJam 5 points ago +7 / -2

You are really prolifically wrong. It’s actually quite impressive.

2
Rage1234 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yea, you are wrong on this one. I dont get the hate train tho. People make mistakes.

1
peltast 1 point ago +2 / -1

I dont get the hate train tho. People make mistakes.

I think because it was said so emphatically, and used actual quote marks. These are hallmarks of being authoritative; which, used so blatantly falsely, give the impression of outright fraud/lying. Anaconda didn't say "I heard...Isn't it true..." etc...he said "etc..."

1
peltast 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is a lie, per other posters. Can you provide evidence?

You are abrasive, and I appreciate it, and often I agree with you. But: This sort of thing, if false, is reckless and damaging to our agenda.