pretty sure they said they wouldn't grant relief but thomas wanted to hear the case, probably for future precedence as her reiterated again in his recent dissent on PA, but yeah, it would be nice if Thomas were the most left learning justice on the court.
I dont get the hate train tho. People make mistakes.
I think because it was said so emphatically, and used actual quote marks. These are hallmarks of being authoritative; which, used so blatantly falsely, give the impression of outright fraud/lying. Anaconda didn't say "I heard...Isn't it true..." etc...he said "etc..."
fuck all 9 of the justices. even thomas and alito said 'no relief shall be granted' in the dec 2020 bullshit tx ruling
Fake news. Thomas dissented. He wrote the dissent that said how the others were basically full of shit.
Alito also dissented
Pretty sure if the only 2 of them should not have been impeached if they were on the Supreme Court 200 years ago are Thomas and Alito
This
pretty sure they said they wouldn't grant relief but thomas wanted to hear the case, probably for future precedence as her reiterated again in his recent dissent on PA, but yeah, it would be nice if Thomas were the most left learning justice on the court.
Dang! That means, not only 'Fake News', but, a downright falsehood. Or lie?
Not everyone who dissents will write a dissenting opinions
Idiot.
You are really prolifically wrong. It’s actually quite impressive.
Yea, you are wrong on this one. I dont get the hate train tho. People make mistakes.
I think because it was said so emphatically, and used actual quote marks. These are hallmarks of being authoritative; which, used so blatantly falsely, give the impression of outright fraud/lying. Anaconda didn't say "I heard...Isn't it true..." etc...he said "etc..."
This is a lie, per other posters. Can you provide evidence?
You are abrasive, and I appreciate it, and often I agree with you. But: This sort of thing, if false, is reckless and damaging to our agenda.