1007
Comments (63)
sorted by:
65
GravityBounce1976 65 points ago +65 / -0

Everything is offensive to Marxists. It's how they destroy culture and individualism, and create the single-identity state.

23
4more 23 points ago +24 / -1

Nah, in this case it is two fold. One there is a commmunist eating and two he is happy. For once I agree with the libtards this is dangerous thinking. Communism only leads to hunger and misery. Basically fake news.

4
doug2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Try as I might I just can't get what you're saying here. Not "get" as in agree, I just can't understand your word choice lol. Apparently I'm alone as 7 people clearly can, but shit. I'm lost.

3
PieceOfParchment7 3 points ago +3 / -0

Communism leads to unhappy and starving people.

This is a drawing of a communist who is happy and fed.

The drawing itself is a lie and propaganda.

3
doug2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ahhhhhh. Got it. It's like a seeing eye puzzle. Now that I get it idk how I didn't see it all along :)

33
henri_derelicte 33 points ago +34 / -1

The illustration in question was a product of its time. It’s an exercise in futility to find anyone prominent before 1945 who would not be considered a horrible person by today’s standards

23
chlofefe 23 points ago +23 / -0

*Before 2008

2
hungryfreaksdaddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

*Before last Thursday.

16
Ponysoldierpatriot 16 points ago +16 / -0

The other issue is that the outrage was not actually from a person of Asian decent. It was from white liberals who projected the book as being offensive. The reality is liberals saying this book is offensive to Asians, is what should really be offensive to Asians. It is the liberals who stereotype and have the attitude that we are smarter than you and know what you should be offended by.

10
Space_Force 10 points ago +10 / -0

Correct, look no further than Native American sports mascots for your fix of SJW fuckery. No Natives give two shits about the Braves or the Indians, the Redskins or the Blackhawks, it's white liberals who are outraged. Some morons who don't quite get the entire point of a mascot is to be the image, the character, the heart of a team. None of these names were chosen out of ill will, no, they chose them to honor them, to say WE are the Redskins. It gets all so tiresome, but liberal must be outraged at something, otherwise they're is no point of getting out of bed for them.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
28
Barbs 28 points ago +28 / -0

This is the already-sanitized version. They even changed “Chinaman” to “Chinese man.”

20
Xtracredit 20 points ago +21 / -1

Chinese people really do have slanted eyes, I swear it, they do

6
BigIronBigIron 6 points ago +6 / -0

And sideways pussies, I heard it from a sailor

2
2
Xtracredit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gen Joe hides them up his butt

2
thisguy883 2 points ago +2 / -0

By god, I thought it was some white supremacy myth, but you're right!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
ParkingLotRanger 10 points ago +13 / -3

Also dude, chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian American please.

10
skatestraight 10 points ago +10 / -0

What if they are from China? I'm so confused

4
Thep1mp 4 points ago +4 / -0

The chinaman is not the issue here dude.

2
PieceOfParchment7 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, so they are Indian or Russian?

14
Asull247 14 points ago +14 / -0

Maybe they are mad that the bunny should be white and the Chinese man should be yellow? Am Asian so allowed to call myself yellow.

8
consumptiveballerina 8 points ago +8 / -0

I have a lot of redneck qualities, so I've always wondered whether I should call myself an orangeneck.

2
MrSir 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tanman

2
consumptiveballerina 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did you just assume my gender???

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
PieceOfParchment7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you from India or Russia?

13
Muzzah 13 points ago +13 / -0

The way I've got it figured, any traditional attire/image is now considered a stereotype and therefore RACIST!

4
spelunking_librator 4 points ago +4 / -0

"I'm a sick fuck.." - looks like a futuristic cube

12
Hugo1000 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is actually a later edited version where they changed Chinaman to Chinese Man and took out the yellow skin and queue (pigtail), but it wasn't enough for the libs who only show the earlier version.

8
happyfave 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm literally shaking

7
RedditIsCommunist 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don’t see what the issue is. Maybe anything that predates the Chinese Cultural Revolution is “racist” now for suggesting anyone ever wore Qing era clothing or something. And this would also mean Chinese TV is full of “racist” historical dramas.

Really what this is is just more psychopaths trying to virtue signal by canceling all images of all minority people.

2
PieceOfParchment7 2 points ago +2 / -0

You aren't supposed to see a problem.

Commies attack their targets culture.

They want a single identity society.

7
Hanging_Chad 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
hey_spike 6 points ago +6 / -0

Any depiction of anyone that doesn't look exactly like them is being 'racist'. -Auntie Jem.. -Uncle Ben -Little Debbie -Paul Neuman -chopstick man -white man with a normal haircut and a sun burnt neck can't depict other cultures either. ...

4
TheMadManDidItAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well.... first off, he's white...

4
bluedevilga 4 points ago +4 / -0

It must be the South African strain of chopsticks that is offensive.

3
WhatWouldMountainDew 3 points ago +3 / -0

Liberals are not offended by this, but they'll say they are to bully others who have a sense of empathy.

I love mocking liberals for their sensitivity, but when we do that, it feeds the lie that their issue is being sensitive instead of the real problem which is they hate America and want to strip western civilization (especially Americans) of their culture, religion, and values.

spez: "reliable sources" from the publisher have leaked pages from the revised book that better reflect our modern sensibilities

https://i.maga.host/PuTICGu.png

3
Fecklessgod 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s not offensive. These people are just fucking idiots.

It’s an amazing picture. It represents Chinese culture very well in one picture. The rice, the chopsticks, the garb, those terrible wood shoes, the hat, and yea the eyes. These are all aspects of being Chinese and Chinese culture.

The problem is that leftists are too fucking stupid to understand that this and other pictures are meant to depict various aspects of the Chinese culture all in one drawing.

Rather they interpret the image to mean that the intention is to characterize all Chinese as this.

It truly is because they are racist, and view everything that way, combine this with victim culture, SJW culture, and cancel culture and here we are.

3
BasedNtruth 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s not about the picture, it’s about tearing down our culture and history

2
SCP0073 2 points ago +2 / -0

You’re looking for logic where none exists.

2
Pederella 2 points ago +2 / -0

But aren't we now suppose to see race and celebrate those people's cultures? 🤷

2
NutterButter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, so apparently only Western clothes are acceptable. And that's not at all offensive.

2
Maxmax 2 points ago +2 / -0

So, I guess reruns of Bonanza is out then.

2
Mintap 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is one of my favorites of the mulberry street mummers.

2
Quality 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the Chinaman should be black and crippled.

2
Conservativechick 2 points ago +2 / -0

When I was young, I had a set of dolls from a bunch of different nations with their different traditional clothing / attributes. I don't understand why this is offensive. I loved the idea that there were so many different types of people and cultures in the world. Isn't that why people travel? To see they way people live in different places? It's why people go to a luau in Hawaii or to see the temples in Asia, or the Mayan ruins in Mexico.

2
deadBeefCafe2014 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude looks like he is having a chill day.

2
chahn1138 2 points ago +2 / -0

Our Asian Bros must agree.....that that is a decent image of a dude eating on the run!

OLOLOL What's not to Love?

1
chahn1138 1 point ago +1 / -0

(He looks kinda stoked! ;0)

2
Seatacjoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the media is saying it's racist for us to go to Chinese owned businesses? Hard to work out their cryptic way if thinking.

1
Patriotic-2A-Addict 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm half white/Korean and I just want to say, this does not offend me!

1
Chachiex 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve noticed a significant drop in liberal hatephags pretending to be “white supremeists” targeting based minirities!

This is what hardened people like Candace Owens, same IP addresses (racist trolls by liberals)

1
cajun_robear 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is only one word to describe this: SOLD!

1
wiombims 1 point ago +1 / -0

The real crime here is that white man with small eyes culturally appropriating chinese man's culture. Easy fix, take some yellow from the rabbit and draw the white man in yellow-face!

1
Former_Libtard 1 point ago +1 / -0

His. Skin. Is. Whiiiiiiite!!!

1
PieceOfParchment7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why color a yellow person white?

Why not paint them black?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
gaijin_ronin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yet democraps keep the blacks are too stupid to vote trope as a need to pass HB1. We all know racism is selective.

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently he later says "and all the servants with eyes at a slant" or somesuch

1
PrezElectHamsandwich 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the same amount of racist as depicting a German wearing lederhosen and holding a mug of beer.

Which is to say, not very much. Harmless and inoffensive stereotypes.

In fact, Germans probably drink beer less often than Chinese eat with chopsticks, because they literally use them for every meal, even breakfast. However, they wear those silly hats and clothes about as much as Germans wear lederhosen, which is like once a year, for Oktoberfest.