When I have more time to write, I’ll get a full detailed update in this thread, but I want to let you know why you’re not hearing anything when the senate got what they wanted.
-
Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs wants the Brennan Center and Voting Works to be the legislatures auditors. Both of these companies are laughably not “non partisan,” inept, and I’ll be getting more into this very shortly. This is on Ducey’s behalf. It’s Kemp/Raffensberger 2.0. They want a super small scope, basically a virus scan and check if it has an internet connection, and this is after SLI and V&V got to mess with everythibg for a week.
-
Fann is basically going which way the wind blows at this point.
-
Jovan is making demands and what are perceived as threats that he doesn’t have the leverage to make other than his “base”. To those in power they look at him as someone who cannot be trusted, because unfortunately he has a history of lying and stirring people up (look up his Oak Island debacle for example). He is giving no specifics, has lied over and over, and is demanding everything associated with the election without giving anything past “I know what I’m doing”. That’s not how things work, but politically the Fann’s feel they’re in a lose / lose situation, and they might as well go with Ducey because if they don’t go with Jovan everyone will be mad anyway. I’ve been trying to be nice about it, but he’s gone too far here.
-
Finchem/Borelli/Peterson (guys on our side) are still fighting, but want the AG to get involved due to this bullshit.
-
The board are trying to make the legislature look inept by saying they don’t know where to put the ballots- the 3 aforementioned people don’t want them being moved anywhere as it’s a crime scene, and the others want them moved for these two bullshit companies to further obfuscate chain of custody.
That’s about it at this moment, please get involved, call / email, whatever you can do- do it. Col. Waldron should be auditing right now, ASOG are the only company who were given a preliminary contract. At minimum, you need to say NO right now to leftist Brennan Center and Voting Works being ANYWHERE NEAR an audit.
I will be back to give more detail, just wanted to get this up fast because it’s gotten bad enough, and I’m not standing by for another Georgia bs move when these are supposed to be republicans “on our side”.
What is so unreasonable of proceeding with Jovan's idea of verifying that EACH ballot is an authentic ballot (using an already accepted method of determining counterfeit currency)? Software/hardware f*ckery caused by the damn voting machines will be nearly impossible to prove unless ALL paper ballots are scanned by a process using optical coherence tomography.
Because he won’t give any specifics, it’s untested (being performed by him), he has no applied experience doing so, a bad history of doing the same thing, and read my comment before, he’s making demands he won’t even accept a random selection of the ballots.
I know that sounds good that one person gets all of them and we know exactly how much fraud occurred, but that immediately gives up corroboration and basically any evidence found to possible alternation. If I audit a casino for a gaming commission, my company doesn’t take all the slots off the floor. Me and another company take a random sample so when our findings match- we corroborate one another and there’s no doubt. He just doesn’t understand auditing, and I don’t blame him I don’t expect everyone to.
Who will be picking "random" ballots? Random sampling is open to corruption by limiting access to known fraudulent ballots. A "random" sampling method eventually becomes "convenience" sampling because (prediction) all ballots will never be available for the sampling process. Due to the high number of dishonest actors involved, there is high probability of numerous clusters of ballots will be missing. That is why all ballots must be accounted for and verified. Therefore, the process should be like a forensic accounting investigation. Forensic accounting is type of financial investigation where the findings of the investigation are commonly used as evidence in court. Such a type of investigation is used for fraud investigation, crime investigation, insurance claims as well as a dispute between shareholders. Since the findings will be used in court, the evidence obtained and used in support of the discovery of fraud must be clear, convincing and strong. ALL ballots must be scanned and evaluated. Convenience sampling is just a fancy term used to describe how the shell game works in deceiving the player.