636
Comments (25)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
BlitheringIdiot 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm still waiting for a reasonable explanation as to why the Towers fell in a manner consistent with an implosion.

0
PraiseBeToScience 0 points ago +1 / -1

What exactly makes you think they should have fallen any other way? Did you expect them to collapse like a fucking tree falling over?

Perfect example of the unintelligence that drives conspiracy. You have no education in this subject, you've never designed a building, you have certainly never seen a center core supported skyscraper collapse so you have nothing to compare it to.

But in your imagination something different should have happened. You probably don't know what, you probably don't know why. But you'll believe in a conspiracy because Feels > Reals.

0
BlitheringIdiot 0 points ago +1 / -1

So, you're asserting that the vertical vector load on all parts of the building were the same simultaneously? Your answer is condescending bullshit; "you're not an expert" garbage. Fuck off.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you literally think it should have fallen over like a tree?

The tower's primary load was extremely centralized due to the box core construction, making them very stable.

If the primary structure and load bearing was around the outside, you might have a point, but they weren't.

The exterior structure fell all across the surrounding streets and blocks anyway so what exactly is your point?

You literally have no reason whatsoever to believe the tower should have collapsed any other way besides "my feeeeeeeeeelings".

And are you actually implying your GED has equipped you to understand anything?

1
BlitheringIdiot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for a more informative answer; you could have said all that to begin with. Why the condescension? And for what it's worth, I have a degree in Physics.