I would like to try to change your mind, they are similar, they like the system because of the overlaps however I think there is a more accurate term. The support the Managerial State, as do neo-cons and the establishment RINO's.
Burnham saw certain commonalities between the economic formations of Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia, and America under Roosevelt's New Deal. Burnham argued that in the short period since the First World War, a new society had emerged in which a social group or class of "managers" had waged a "drive for social dominance, for power and privilege, for the position of ruling class."[26] For at least the previous decade, there had grown in America the idea of a "separation of ownership and control"
There is significant overlap between the concepts of the managerial state and the deep state, with theorists of the managerial state additionally drawing from theories of political religion and the secularization of Christian concepts, namely Puritanism,[5] which they contend demand an overweening concern with government intervention in favor of social justice, unaccountable regulation of citizens' private lives, and both informally and formally enforced political correctness.[6] Theorists of the managerial state claim this constellation of factors tends towards the efflux of totalitarianism, which they call soft totalitarianism[7] and engage in criticism of administrative law and rulemaking.[8]
This needs to be read and analyzed. It may be that ‘commie’ is just too simple a way to analyze what we are dealing with today. Much of the demorats power derives from their alliance with global corporatists. And, they do nothing to benefit anyone but govt workers, global corps, and foreign countries. How then can all of our analysis land at ‘they’re just a bunch of commies’?
I’m coming around to a view that thinking of them in left/right terms is a mental trap, designed to keep us arguing over nonsense.
I would like to try to change your mind, they are similar, they like the system because of the overlaps however I think there is a more accurate term. The support the Managerial State, as do neo-cons and the establishment RINO's.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Burnham
Burnham saw certain commonalities between the economic formations of Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia, and America under Roosevelt's New Deal. Burnham argued that in the short period since the First World War, a new society had emerged in which a social group or class of "managers" had waged a "drive for social dominance, for power and privilege, for the position of ruling class."[26] For at least the previous decade, there had grown in America the idea of a "separation of ownership and control"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Managerial_state
There is significant overlap between the concepts of the managerial state and the deep state, with theorists of the managerial state additionally drawing from theories of political religion and the secularization of Christian concepts, namely Puritanism,[5] which they contend demand an overweening concern with government intervention in favor of social justice, unaccountable regulation of citizens' private lives, and both informally and formally enforced political correctness.[6] Theorists of the managerial state claim this constellation of factors tends towards the efflux of totalitarianism, which they call soft totalitarianism[7] and engage in criticism of administrative law and rulemaking.[8]
This needs to be read and analyzed. It may be that ‘commie’ is just too simple a way to analyze what we are dealing with today. Much of the demorats power derives from their alliance with global corporatists. And, they do nothing to benefit anyone but govt workers, global corps, and foreign countries. How then can all of our analysis land at ‘they’re just a bunch of commies’? I’m coming around to a view that thinking of them in left/right terms is a mental trap, designed to keep us arguing over nonsense.