The four Laws of Thermodynamics call into question much of the "greenhouse gas effect ( GHGs)", but let's assume that GHG's do actually contribute 16.3°K of total climate. We can do the math and I will post the more detailed scientific path t8 the following algorithmic conclusion as a main post in the future. But the crux of the so called IPCC science and CO2 is that CO2 supposedly can hold and sustain a Kinetic Energy Radiant (Heat) Value (RFeK) = 1.94 x that of the most common GHG, water (H2O). It is this NASA and IPCC published factor of energy that allows scientists to state, "CO2 is twice as dangerous a GHG as H2O." Of course they speak of the molecular part of each.
It is interesting to note that H2O is still the most important GHG and according to NASA and the IPCC up until the Biden Administration took over, was still recognized as the principal GHG. With an energy retention value of 1.00 compared to CO2 at 1.94, it's really rather easy to expose the CO2 Hoax.
There being 25000 ppm of H2O in the atmosphere we can boil all the variables and those 15,000 studies down to this...
Of all the extra RFeK contributed by GHGs...
H20 contributes 25,000 ok units, while CO2 at 1.94 x 409 ppm contributes less than 800. We'll add ALL OTHER retention eK units from other tiny trace gases like CH4 (methane) etc and round up to 1,000 eK units in a million parts of Atmosphere.
So water contributes 25/26ths of all GHG heat.
Of the trace elements, only about 1/6th at the most is human caused. And, since all GHG's only contribute 16.3°K to our total wwT (climate) of 288.8°K, we can do the math and calculate the entire human carbon footprint over 125 years (assuming the CO2 Levels really were just 280 back in 1895, as that is easily questioned too). But worst case scenario, let's assume all the above based on IPCC papers is actually true ..
The human C-footprint from CO2 would be:
16.3/288.8°K × 1/26 (GHG%) x 1/5 (Human GHG %) = .0004342° Change over 125 years. Yes CO2 causes Warming. But the amount us almost undetectable and significantly less by an enormous factor. It is quite clear that if wwT:287.8°K...288.8°K is actually true since 1895, then humans could only have caused a tiny fraction of the 1°K change as .0004342°K is significantly LESS THAN 1.
The four Laws of Thermodynamics call into question much of the "greenhouse gas effect ( GHGs)", but let's assume that GHG's do actually contribute 16.3°K of total climate. We can do the math and I will post the more detailed scientific path t8 the following algorithmic conclusion as a main post in the future. But the crux of the so called IPCC science and CO2 is that CO2 supposedly can hold and sustain a Kinetic Energy Radiant (Heat) Value (RFeK) = 1.94 x that of the most common GHG, water (H2O). It is this NASA and IPCC published factor of energy that allows scientists to state, "CO2 is twice as dangerous a GHG as H2O." Of course they speak of the molecular part of each.
It is interesting to note that H2O is still the most important GHG and according to NASA and the IPCC up until the Biden Administration took over, was still recognized as the principal GHG. With an energy retention value of 1.00 compared to CO2 at 1.94, it's really rather easy to expose the CO2 Hoax.
There being 25000 ppm of H2O in the atmosphere we can boil all the variables and those 15,000 studies down to this...
Of all the extra RFeK contributed by GHGs...
H20 contributes 25,000 ok units, while CO2 at 1.94 x 409 ppm contributes less than 800. We'll add ALL OTHER retention eK units from other tiny trace gases like CH4 (methane) etc and round up to 1,000 eK units in a million parts of Atmosphere.
So water contributes 25/26ths of all GHG heat. Of the trace elements, only about 1/6th at the most is human caused. And, since all GHG's only contribute 16.3°K to our total wwT (climate) of 288.8°K, we can do the math and calculate the entire human carbon footprint over 125 years (assuming the CO2 Levels really were just 280 back in 1895, as that is easily questioned too). But worst case scenario, let's assume all the above based on IPCC papers is actually true ..
The human C-footprint from CO2 would be:
16.3/288.8°K × 1/26 (GHG%) x 1/5 (Human GHG %) = .0004342° Change over 125 years. Yes CO2 causes Warming. But the amount us almost undetectable and significantly less by an enormous factor. It is quite clear that if wwT:287.8°K...288.8°K is actually true since 1895, then humans could only have caused a tiny fraction of the 1°K change as .0004342°K is significantly LESS THAN 1.