Sorry, sir; in this article Mann appears to be claiming, imo, that whatever 'natural forced' variables are acting on the AMO cycles, his data clearly show that 'human forced' variables, meaning BadOlHumankind, are even more influential than thought prior.
IOW, same ol' same ol' from the inventor of TheHockeyStick hoax, for same ol' same ol' intent to promote reflexive reaction not reflective rethinking.
Article written in dense academe-ese, thus points made are deliberately danced around to avoid triggering any sjw response, as routine for academic sources.
Sorry, sir; in this article Mann appears to be claiming, imo, that whatever 'natural forced' variables are acting on the AMO cycles, his data clearly show that 'human forced' variables, meaning BadOlHumankind, are even more influential than thought prior.
IOW, same ol' same ol' from the inventor of TheHockeyStick hoax, for same ol' same ol' intent to promote reflexive reaction not reflective rethinking.
Article written in dense academe-ese, thus points made are deliberately danced around to avoid triggering any sjw response, as routine for academic sources.
But that's the way it appears from here, imo...