882
Comments (50)
sorted by:
36
South_Florida_Guy 36 points ago +36 / -0

Muh "Republicans in congress blocked us" in 3...2...1

20
thisisatestof2 20 points ago +20 / -0

I love the leftists who keep blaming the Republicans on the failure of buying to get anything through Congress when they have majorities in both houses. I tried point to that out to one of them so the natural response Was to call me a racist.

1
giantrabbit1 [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

Technically on things that are not budget reconciliation, Republicans are blocking it (which is a good thing btw). You need 60 votes to pass any legislation that isn't a budget reconciliation bill.

11
medicpatriot 11 points ago +11 / -0

“They STONEWALLED us”

8
jubyeonin 8 points ago +8 / -0

Democrats blocked stimulus for months and the left blamed Republicans. Democrats got all their goodies passed and they got praised for it.

8
medicpatriot 8 points ago +8 / -0

honestly if I was a US senator I would filibuster every bill brought for a vote. A non-functioning government is the best thing we could ask for at this point.

23
TonyTreehouse 23 points ago +23 / -0

They know this would tank the economy and Joe would rightly get the blame.

7
snowypepe 7 points ago +7 / -0

This would completely destroy any small business still surviving after the plandemic

5
goldkeyboardwarrior 5 points ago +6 / -1

No, they would still find a way to blame Trump. Probably say that things he supposedly failed to do during the pandemic led to a chain reaction that we are finally seeing the result of conveniently after Biden has already been in power for a few months.

3
Monz 3 points ago +3 / -0

This. They will find a way to blame Trump.

17
Warcraft1966 17 points ago +17 / -0

But ok with all the 100s of billion sent to other countries....nice

2
jubyeonin 2 points ago +2 / -0

As long as the effects don't hit us all at once, they're okay with it. It's like hot potato with a grenade. As long as they aren't there when it happens, it's good for them.

14
JamesEarlPwns 14 points ago +14 / -0

I cannot fathom how anyone thought it was a good idea to implement such a massive wage increase before businesses can recoup their losses from last year. Truly, scary thinking. Or lack thereof.

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are under the impression they want employed people and businesses around

1
JamesEarlPwns 1 point ago +1 / -0

How else would they generate tax revenue?

7
FamburgerHelper 7 points ago +7 / -0

$15 minimum wage benefits China directly. What corporations are pushing for a nationwide minimum wage? Corporations like Wal*Mart. Nothing is stopping them from paying their workers $15, why do they need a law? Because if it's the law, small retailers will go broke, close up shop & big corporations that sell cheap shit made in China (that goes for you, too Amazon) will attain total retail hegemony.

This is good news.

5
StartAgain 5 points ago +5 / -0

What's the current federal minimum wage

8
FamburgerHelper 8 points ago +8 / -0

In Seattle it's $15.00 an hour; however, if you work for a company that employs [x] amount of people, it goes up to $16.69. My son just took an entry level job at a company and his starting wage is $15 an hour, but until benefits kick in, he is being paid $16.69 an hour plus another dollar an hour for "hazard" pay so for the next month anyway, he's making $17.69 an hour.

5
jubyeonin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Damn. Time to move to Seattle. lol no

1
JoeSlidinsNose 1 point ago +1 / -0

I make better than that in "flyover" country, and it goes at least twice as far than in Cuckattle.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you don't mind my asking, what do you do for a living? Generally speaking of course

1
JoeSlidinsNose 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm a 911 operator. I'm also in college pursuing a degree to maybe do even better.

2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey, that's not an easy profession. Stay strong, I know it can be hard to hear some of the things.

Thank you for what you do.

4
StartAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

why do dems want to raise federal minimum wage? to bankrupt U.S.A. from all the money that they give to illegals?

5
MarginofFraud 5 points ago +5 / -0

Half that much

10
cjcivicx 10 points ago +10 / -0

Should be zero! Why should the government tell a business what they should pay someone?

7
TonyTreehouse 7 points ago +7 / -0

And also what someone would be willing to work for. The least qualified and least employable people are the first to be fired when the minimum wage goes up. And many of them will have to go on welfare for the rest of their lives.

Especially if you're a man, if you don't have a job, you're a nobody.

2
cjcivicx 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yep. Women, especially attractive women have the option to just find a man and latch on, their only job to act like they give a fuck about the guy and maybe spread their legs once in a while.

I guess good looking gay guys could try that too, but I'm sure that's few and far between in society, even today!

1
pikX 1 point ago +3 / -2

depends. unfortunately some people will abuse their power and underpay workers on purpose.

3
cjcivicx 3 points ago +3 / -0

They can work somewhere else, can't they? If people are too weak to walk away from abuse, they deserve what they get.

0
JoeSlidinsNose 0 points ago +1 / -1

They can work somewhere else, until they can't. I'm not saying the minimum wage is a good idea, but hand-waving that "they can just work somewhere else" is ignoring why minimum wage was created in the first place. It was a knee-jerk reaction to a populace being absolutely fucking raped over in labor value.

I'm conservative to the core, I don't like the idea of minimum wage, but doing away with it completely without an alternative to stop the abuse is just returning to a time when the American worker was the equivalent of a slave. If I had my way, I would eliminate the minimum wage and pass a new law that says to pay people what they are worth and stop being a fucking greedy piece of shit, but alas.

1
cjcivicx 1 point ago +1 / -0

There weren't options like there are today, and people can easily pick up and move without a wagon train. If they are too weak to move on from a bad job, they deserve it.

Winners and losers exist for a reason, and it's not because life is fair.

0
JoeSlidinsNose 0 points ago +1 / -1

So you have job A, B, and C. Right now, federal minimum wage mandates $7.25 an hour.

So you work at A.

Federal minimum wage is abolished with no other safety net.

Employer A says, well, we're going to lower wages to $4 an hour.

You say "That's bulllshitttt!!" and go to job B, which is still paying $7.25 an hour. Job B heard what job A did, and they set the pay to $4.01 an hour.

Job C hears about this and decides they are clever, so they set their wage to $4.25 an hour.

All prices are the same as they always have been.

Everyone wants to work at Company C because they pay the highest in the field, but it's still fucking garbage.

You finally get on at Company C making 25 cents more an hour than everyone else in your field. You have the nicest cardboard box on the sidewalk, and since you can't afford a car, you get lots of sunshine and exercise.

Prices and the economy will eventually adjust to the new economic conditions, but there will be a LOT of fucking misery in the meantime. The first place businesses try to cut costs is labor because labor is the most expensive aspect of doing business, but they will do so irresponsibly and selfishly and as quickly as possible to improve their bottom line for the impending recession/depression.

We should not increase minimum wage, but we should not immediately abolish it. Sudden change of a magnitude that great would be very destructive. We could probably wean ourselves off of it a quarter at a time over the next couple of decades, but it can't go away at once. Nor can it double, which these idiot Democrats can't get through their fucking skulls.

2
Pede3 2 points ago +2 / -0

7.25/h. Waiter/waitress is more complicated - 2.13 in some states and depend on tips for the remainder of the wage.

5
MN_Centipede 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Democrats aren’t as unified or far left as we thought. There are moderates voting independently of their party line. Very patriotic and brave.

5
Cmchn 5 points ago +5 / -0

If this trend keeps up, I'll gladly admit they aren't as nuts as I thought

3
xBigCoffinHunter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not when it came to POTUS. Fuck we’d occasionally get Manchin.

4
cyberwar 4 points ago +4 / -0

fuck the commies

4
triforce28 4 points ago +4 / -0

Let the states set it. Fuck off feds

2
Pede3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree. States, or preferably even counties, should set min wage. It is ridiculous to compare a city to rural areas, or two states which have dramatically different costs of living.

3
IncredibleMrE1 3 points ago +3 / -0

KEK this is hilarious.

2
0xTC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Keep in mind, Biden and the democrats never wanted this. AOC and the squad did, but not old school democrats. Old schoolers rub elbows with and are friends of those whose pockets would be affected by this. No, Biden just dangles this as a political tool and nothing more.

1
MAGA-Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

Minimum wage debate is what they go to when they want to distract. Good for a news spot, debate about small changes rather than just set it to inflation rate.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
cajun_robear 1 point ago +1 / -0

We've been clobbered over the head so much that we're now celebrating a close vote that should have been 100 - 0.

1
mushroomhead 1 point ago +1 / -0

yep now they can riot in 2022 great same old issues new protestors you have to learn from ur mistakes...let it pass when employment hits 20 percent say ots what yu wanted now what??? quit saving stupid people

1
sanitaryshave 1 point ago +1 / -0

So 58 voted against or 58 voted for and they didn't get to 60?

0
Siretch 0 points ago +1 / -1

rise of blue dog democrats!

2
c0mpl3x 2 points ago +2 / -0

Until commie pelosi makes them lick the boot