23
Comments (10)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
wethedownvoted 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've never understood why this bother's people. What is different between many local broadcasters owned by one company reading an editorial, and a national broadcaster owned by one company reading an editorial? No one saw more than one of the local broadcasts, it's the nature of local broadcasting.

1
Wheres_Varg [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you look at the backgrounds of some of these, they're Fox, they're CBS, ect. ect.. It's the mainstream repeating of buzz words, it's brainwashing.

1
wethedownvoted 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes, local broadcasters are associated with networks, not owned. these were all stations owned by sinclair broadcast group

1
Wheres_Varg [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, John Stewart use to do these types of videos all the time, every week.. CNN does it, Fox does it, it's also a national thing. I'm not understanding your point here? Are you debonking this in some way? These people are talking to a demographic (old people - voters)... You combine this kind of bullshit, with all the other crap "they" are doing to us (fluoride, gmo's, social media), and it's a giant net over us, influencing our behaviors and choices..

1
wethedownvoted 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's my point, how is this different from CNN or Fox? it's the same thing but for some reason Sinclair has been getting shit on for years over this one editorial but MSNBC and CNN do it all day every day.

why does it matter if grandma in MO hears the same thing as grandma in KY? they hear the same things from CNN and Fox. at least this was introduced as an editorial.