2890
Comments (104)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
BahamaDon 2 points ago +3 / -1

Don't know exactly how to or even if I want to say anything good about Rand after the "erection" dysfunction. What he just did does not exonerate him from doing NOTHING during the certification, however what he just did was good.

3
liberpede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agree his vote to certify was hard to take.

In particular because I still consider him to be a genuine, well intentioned man.

I'm certain he had considerations I'm not aware of, and he's been better than almost every other senator...

Still, I'd like to hear him explain it.

1
BahamaDon 1 point ago +1 / -0

The libertarian principals his father espoused was that individual rights trump states rights, and he was making it all a states rights vs. federal government rights thing. Individual rights trump all of them, and every disenfranchanchised voter had their rights totally trampled on without a second look. Totally just dismissed the rights of the individuals during the debating on the issue. WTH?

0
Praetor_Sean 0 points ago +1 / -1

He did explain his reasons on the 6th, check his twitter from then.

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1346936083351793665

He basically said that voting to "overturn" state certified results would harm states rights, blah blah. It sounds great if the election was legit. But since it wasn't Rand can fuck right off.

1
Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is how they suck you back in.

Little scraps for the plebs while the keep you a slave.