So, you believe Rand chose to vote to certify, not because he believed there was no fraud, but because there was no good outcome to voting otherwise, and it could potentially make the situation worse.
Without knowing everything he would have known in those circumstances, it becomes very difficult to judge whether I think he did the right thing there. A flaming middle finger to the establishment would have been nice, but not at any cost.
That is a well reasoned analysis.
So, you believe Rand chose to vote to certify, not because he believed there was no fraud, but because there was no good outcome to voting otherwise, and it could potentially make the situation worse.
Without knowing everything he would have known in those circumstances, it becomes very difficult to judge whether I think he did the right thing there. A flaming middle finger to the establishment would have been nice, but not at any cost.