Seems like this would be something people don’t ever have to think about. Why wouldn’t insurance or the doctor just handle these details?
Nobody would get insurance fraud for that(which I don’t even remember reading about in the pdf)
That’s the point. It isn’t insurance fraud. It’s the same with the reasoning on how they determined they were justified in surveilling him, because he was hanging around “a known location where drug users frequent” which turned out to be the Safeway pharmacy. It’s like...yeah, people who do drugs go to the pharmacy. That’s the whole point of pharmacies, to get “drugs”. And yes, pharmaceutical drug companies change the formulas of their medications. So technically the ‘government’ was correct. He WAS using a medication that wasn’t strictly what was stated on his insurance and technically he WAS in a place where drug users frequent, but it’s trivial and capricious and that’s what makes it scary and abusive
Seems like this would be something people don’t ever have to think about. Why wouldn’t insurance or the doctor just handle these details?
Nobody would get insurance fraud for that(which I don’t even remember reading about in the pdf)
That’s the point. It isn’t insurance fraud. It’s the same with the reasoning on how they determined they were justified in surveilling him, because he was hanging around “a known location where drug users frequent” which turned out to be the Safeway pharmacy. It’s like...yeah, people who do drugs go to the pharmacy. That’s the whole point of pharmacies, to get “drugs”. And yes, pharmaceutical drug companies change the formulas of their medications. So technically the ‘government’ was correct. He WAS using a medication that wasn’t strictly what was stated on his insurance and technically he WAS in a place where drug users frequent, but it’s trivial and capricious and that’s what makes it scary and abusive