I think you are right. All of the other ones actually have a logical conclusion where the deep state has a clear goal that you can see being implemented in the aftermath of the event. Like them pushing gun control, creating a surveillance state, or going to war. This one has no logical conclusion as to why they would do such a thing.
There is a very logical conclusion why it was done and It worked perfectly.
Very badly done psyop but still the end result came out probably better than they had hoped.
At the time there was an objection to the Arizona vote results and for the first time there was going to be a presentation of voter fraud evidence to a big primetime TV audience.
But it was interrupted when shots rang out.
The planned news reports went out immediately that a 16 year old girl had been shot in the chest and killed. When the video suddenly appeared however all that had to be changed.
To show you how effective it was, when the proceedings began again at 2 PM in the morning Senator Loeffler said that she had planned to raise an objection but because of the events of the day she was withdrawing that.
A bonus from a supposed death was that a call could be made immediately to impeach Trump for his speech that resulted in a "death".
If shots were all it took and they didn’t want to kill anyone, they could have just fired them at the wall or reported that shots were fired.
And if they wanted cause to impeach Trump for a death, they wouldn’t have fake killed one of his unarmed supporters. They would have fake killed a police officer, which they sort of did with the fake reporting that Sicknick died from a fire extinguisher to the head.
If you look at the video he did fire (probably at a wall) straight down the hallway. But shots themselves would not necessarily do the job (people might think they are accidental) But reporting a person killed and parading a body past everybody really helps to raise the panic level.
If they fake killed a police officer on video it would be very hard to explain why they are not prosecuting the Trump Supporter that did it. Plus they probably hoped that the outrage at a 16 year old Trump Supporter being killed would would cause a lot of violent reactions but that did not happen.
Dude, you’re lost. There is so much evidence to the contrary of what you are saying. If the deep state was in on this it would have been so much easier to actually kill someone.
You mentioned that it would be hard to justify why they are not prosecuting if they fake killed a cop. Well guess what, THEY ARE PROSECUTING. She has a legal team that is prosecuting it as an unwarranted police shooting.
There are also a million other questions that come up, like: She’s a household name now with pictures all over the internet, how the hell would they hide her after this?
Or maybe, just maybe, it was all real, and the one stupid video that tries to debunk it is made by some no-name jackass with zero reasoning skills. He’s in that video talking about how the blood should be flowing as if he is some sort of CSI expert and you fell for that? Give me a break. He’s trying to capitalize off of smooth brains like you
I have watched it and gave a detailed reply to someone else as to how the video is intentionally misleading. It’s using a persuasion trick to prevent you from thinking critically about each of his claims. He does not want you to think of other explanations as to why those things might be occurring in the shooting. Here is the more detailed reply I gave earlier:
“Each one of his points should be met with this question: Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Here are just some examples:
The glass is "hollywood" plastic glass. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, it could just be fake glass because they built that door frame with fake glass. Why does it have to be real glass for this to be a real shooting?
Her backpack is cushy, a perfect way to break her fall. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, she was carrying things because she was at a multi-hour protest. You will recall that in the days leading up to the 6th there were tons of posts on here telling people what to pack.
She is just staring off into the distance as if nothing happened. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, watch any other video of someone who got shot or cut in a critical area like the neck and they all do this.
The blood looks as if it is defying gravity, almost like it is being pumped from a fake bloodpack. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, it's called a fucking heart. We all have one. It pumps blood against the forces of gravity.
This is where you should have realized the guy who created the video is a bullshit artist. He is using something called the laundry list approach to persuasion. He is throwing a bunch of things at the audience rapidly so that you don't have time to think about them. By the end of the video you go, "wow that was a lot, gee this sure seems suspicious." But if you actually take the time to question each thing and see if you can think of any other reason as to why things are happening, you will find the answers quite easily.”
And when you watch the video she took a LONG fall backwards, no reason to do it that way if it was going to be faked, she easily could have cracked the back of her head open if things were off by only a couple inches. And her attorney says she was shot in the chest, not the neck. Another reason blood wasn't gushing.
I think you are right. All of the other ones actually have a logical conclusion where the deep state has a clear goal that you can see being implemented in the aftermath of the event. Like them pushing gun control, creating a surveillance state, or going to war. This one has no logical conclusion as to why they would do such a thing.
There is a very logical conclusion why it was done and It worked perfectly.
Very badly done psyop but still the end result came out probably better than they had hoped.
At the time there was an objection to the Arizona vote results and for the first time there was going to be a presentation of voter fraud evidence to a big primetime TV audience. But it was interrupted when shots rang out.
The planned news reports went out immediately that a 16 year old girl had been shot in the chest and killed. When the video suddenly appeared however all that had to be changed.
To show you how effective it was, when the proceedings began again at 2 PM in the morning Senator Loeffler said that she had planned to raise an objection but because of the events of the day she was withdrawing that.
A bonus from a supposed death was that a call could be made immediately to impeach Trump for his speech that resulted in a "death".
If shots were all it took and they didn’t want to kill anyone, they could have just fired them at the wall or reported that shots were fired.
And if they wanted cause to impeach Trump for a death, they wouldn’t have fake killed one of his unarmed supporters. They would have fake killed a police officer, which they sort of did with the fake reporting that Sicknick died from a fire extinguisher to the head.
If you look at the video he did fire (probably at a wall) straight down the hallway. But shots themselves would not necessarily do the job (people might think they are accidental) But reporting a person killed and parading a body past everybody really helps to raise the panic level.
If they fake killed a police officer on video it would be very hard to explain why they are not prosecuting the Trump Supporter that did it. Plus they probably hoped that the outrage at a 16 year old Trump Supporter being killed would would cause a lot of violent reactions but that did not happen.
Dude, you’re lost. There is so much evidence to the contrary of what you are saying. If the deep state was in on this it would have been so much easier to actually kill someone.
You mentioned that it would be hard to justify why they are not prosecuting if they fake killed a cop. Well guess what, THEY ARE PROSECUTING. She has a legal team that is prosecuting it as an unwarranted police shooting.
There are also a million other questions that come up, like: She’s a household name now with pictures all over the internet, how the hell would they hide her after this?
Or maybe, just maybe, it was all real, and the one stupid video that tries to debunk it is made by some no-name jackass with zero reasoning skills. He’s in that video talking about how the blood should be flowing as if he is some sort of CSI expert and you fell for that? Give me a break. He’s trying to capitalize off of smooth brains like you
Give this a view (21 minutes) and see if you feel any differently.
I have watched it and gave a detailed reply to someone else as to how the video is intentionally misleading. It’s using a persuasion trick to prevent you from thinking critically about each of his claims. He does not want you to think of other explanations as to why those things might be occurring in the shooting. Here is the more detailed reply I gave earlier:
“Each one of his points should be met with this question: Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Here are just some examples:
The glass is "hollywood" plastic glass. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, it could just be fake glass because they built that door frame with fake glass. Why does it have to be real glass for this to be a real shooting?
Her backpack is cushy, a perfect way to break her fall. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, she was carrying things because she was at a multi-hour protest. You will recall that in the days leading up to the 6th there were tons of posts on here telling people what to pack.
She is just staring off into the distance as if nothing happened. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, watch any other video of someone who got shot or cut in a critical area like the neck and they all do this.
The blood looks as if it is defying gravity, almost like it is being pumped from a fake bloodpack. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, it's called a fucking heart. We all have one. It pumps blood against the forces of gravity.
This is where you should have realized the guy who created the video is a bullshit artist. He is using something called the laundry list approach to persuasion. He is throwing a bunch of things at the audience rapidly so that you don't have time to think about them. By the end of the video you go, "wow that was a lot, gee this sure seems suspicious." But if you actually take the time to question each thing and see if you can think of any other reason as to why things are happening, you will find the answers quite easily.”
And when you watch the video she took a LONG fall backwards, no reason to do it that way if it was going to be faked, she easily could have cracked the back of her head open if things were off by only a couple inches. And her attorney says she was shot in the chest, not the neck. Another reason blood wasn't gushing.
Really it was the chest? Then that debunks the claim that the gun wasn’t pointing at her neck when fired.
ROFL.
Glow harder. Your hand waving attempts to dismiss real questions are lame.
It's not even about feelings at this point. The facts are that it was a false flag and the shooting was staged.