I have watched it and gave a detailed reply to someone else as to how the video is intentionally misleading. It’s using a persuasion trick to prevent you from thinking critically about each of his claims. He does not want you to think of other explanations as to why those things might be occurring in the shooting. Here is the more detailed reply I gave earlier:
“Each one of his points should be met with this question: Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Here are just some examples:
The glass is "hollywood" plastic glass. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, it could just be fake glass because they built that door frame with fake glass. Why does it have to be real glass for this to be a real shooting?
Her backpack is cushy, a perfect way to break her fall. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, she was carrying things because she was at a multi-hour protest. You will recall that in the days leading up to the 6th there were tons of posts on here telling people what to pack.
She is just staring off into the distance as if nothing happened. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, watch any other video of someone who got shot or cut in a critical area like the neck and they all do this.
The blood looks as if it is defying gravity, almost like it is being pumped from a fake bloodpack. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, it's called a fucking heart. We all have one. It pumps blood against the forces of gravity.
This is where you should have realized the guy who created the video is a bullshit artist. He is using something called the laundry list approach to persuasion. He is throwing a bunch of things at the audience rapidly so that you don't have time to think about them. By the end of the video you go, "wow that was a lot, gee this sure seems suspicious." But if you actually take the time to question each thing and see if you can think of any other reason as to why things are happening, you will find the answers quite easily.”
And when you watch the video she took a LONG fall backwards, no reason to do it that way if it was going to be faked, she easily could have cracked the back of her head open if things were off by only a couple inches. And her attorney says she was shot in the chest, not the neck. Another reason blood wasn't gushing.
I have watched it and gave a detailed reply to someone else as to how the video is intentionally misleading. It’s using a persuasion trick to prevent you from thinking critically about each of his claims. He does not want you to think of other explanations as to why those things might be occurring in the shooting. Here is the more detailed reply I gave earlier:
“Each one of his points should be met with this question: Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Here are just some examples:
The glass is "hollywood" plastic glass. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, it could just be fake glass because they built that door frame with fake glass. Why does it have to be real glass for this to be a real shooting?
Her backpack is cushy, a perfect way to break her fall. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, she was carrying things because she was at a multi-hour protest. You will recall that in the days leading up to the 6th there were tons of posts on here telling people what to pack.
She is just staring off into the distance as if nothing happened. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, watch any other video of someone who got shot or cut in a critical area like the neck and they all do this.
The blood looks as if it is defying gravity, almost like it is being pumped from a fake bloodpack. Is there any other reason why that could be the case? Yes, it's called a fucking heart. We all have one. It pumps blood against the forces of gravity.
This is where you should have realized the guy who created the video is a bullshit artist. He is using something called the laundry list approach to persuasion. He is throwing a bunch of things at the audience rapidly so that you don't have time to think about them. By the end of the video you go, "wow that was a lot, gee this sure seems suspicious." But if you actually take the time to question each thing and see if you can think of any other reason as to why things are happening, you will find the answers quite easily.”
And when you watch the video she took a LONG fall backwards, no reason to do it that way if it was going to be faked, she easily could have cracked the back of her head open if things were off by only a couple inches. And her attorney says she was shot in the chest, not the neck. Another reason blood wasn't gushing.
Really it was the chest? Then that debunks the claim that the gun wasn’t pointing at her neck when fired.
According to this statement
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/ashli-babbitts-legal-team-releases-first-official-press-release/
Thanks for the source. Btw it seems a bit overkill to hire a legal team if you faked a death doesn’t it?
ROFL.
Glow harder. Your hand waving attempts to dismiss real questions are lame.