2987
Comments (193)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
OXIE 2 points ago +8 / -6

There is a very logical conclusion why it was done and It worked perfectly.

Very badly done psyop but still the end result came out probably better than they had hoped.

At the time there was an objection to the Arizona vote results and for the first time there was going to be a presentation of voter fraud evidence to a big primetime TV audience. But it was interrupted when shots rang out.

The planned news reports went out immediately that a 16 year old girl had been shot in the chest and killed. When the video suddenly appeared however all that had to be changed.

To show you how effective it was, when the proceedings began again at 2 PM in the morning Senator Loeffler said that she had planned to raise an objection but because of the events of the day she was withdrawing that.

A bonus from a supposed death was that a call could be made immediately to impeach Trump for his speech that resulted in a "death".

2
tombombadil 2 points ago +5 / -3

If shots were all it took and they didn’t want to kill anyone, they could have just fired them at the wall or reported that shots were fired.

And if they wanted cause to impeach Trump for a death, they wouldn’t have fake killed one of his unarmed supporters. They would have fake killed a police officer, which they sort of did with the fake reporting that Sicknick died from a fire extinguisher to the head.

1
OXIE 1 point ago +7 / -6

If you look at the video he did fire (probably at a wall) straight down the hallway. But shots themselves would not necessarily do the job (people might think they are accidental) But reporting a person killed and parading a body past everybody really helps to raise the panic level.

If they fake killed a police officer on video it would be very hard to explain why they are not prosecuting the Trump Supporter that did it. Plus they probably hoped that the outrage at a 16 year old Trump Supporter being killed would would cause a lot of violent reactions but that did not happen.

1
tombombadil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, you’re lost. There is so much evidence to the contrary of what you are saying. If the deep state was in on this it would have been so much easier to actually kill someone.

You mentioned that it would be hard to justify why they are not prosecuting if they fake killed a cop. Well guess what, THEY ARE PROSECUTING. She has a legal team that is prosecuting it as an unwarranted police shooting.

There are also a million other questions that come up, like: She’s a household name now with pictures all over the internet, how the hell would they hide her after this?

Or maybe, just maybe, it was all real, and the one stupid video that tries to debunk it is made by some no-name jackass with zero reasoning skills. He’s in that video talking about how the blood should be flowing as if he is some sort of CSI expert and you fell for that? Give me a break. He’s trying to capitalize off of smooth brains like you