So states have zero say regarding illegals in their domains? Doesn't seem Constitutional. Ironically, in the case you mention, Eric Holder argued that it was unconstitutional for states to be involved. What a complete load shit.

Apparently it ended up before the Supreme Court, who then rendered this shit decision (emphasis mine):

The Supreme Court in a 5-3 opinion by Justice Kennedy on June 25, 2012 affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito each filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. (Kagan, J., recused). The Court's determined that Sections 3, 5(C), and 6 of 2010 Ariz. S.B. 1070 are preempted. This nullified the provisions that make it a state crime to be in the United States without proper authorization (Section 3), for undocumented immigrants to apply for a job or work in Arizona (5(C)), and the provision that authorizes state law enforcement officials to arrests without a warrant any individual otherwise lawfully in the country, if they have probable cause to believe that individual has committed a deportable offense. The Court left intact, though subject to later challenges in lower courts, Section 2(B) which requires police to arrest and hold anyone they believe has committed a crime and whom they think is in the country illegally, and holding them until their immigration status could be checked with federal officials.

States should absolutely buck against that. It leaves them all but disempowered to deal with illegals in their state, except entirely by the accords of the Federal government. Which, at the moment, is rendering ICE powerless too.

Meh.courts moot so do it anyway