Again, one is real and can be proven many ways without even needing to see it.
The other is a fictional story. A book. Zero credibility period.
It's been researched and studied for over a thousand years. Only biased believers come back with any "evidence".
"I CoMpAre TheSE AnD CAlL iT lOGiCc" <---- That's you. Truth is, you don't even compare them. You regurgitated a response you've heard others make. I know you did because I hear the exact same "bUt YoU CaNt SEe aTOms ...etc...."
Whatever dude. I haven't tried to prove anything in this thread. I'm just pointing out how your thinking is not the absolute straightforward truth you think it is.
Eh 500 years ago people would laugh at you for claiming atoms exist.
Again, one is real and can be proven many ways without even needing to see it.
The other is a fictional story. A book. Zero credibility period.
It's been researched and studied for over a thousand years. Only biased believers come back with any "evidence".
"I CoMpAre TheSE AnD CAlL iT lOGiCc" <---- That's you. Truth is, you don't even compare them. You regurgitated a response you've heard others make. I know you did because I hear the exact same "bUt YoU CaNt SEe aTOms ...etc...."
You're all a bunch of dumb fucks lol
Well, by your mentality the Clinton Foundation is really just an innocent do-good organization because nobody's been able to prove their evils LOL
Smh. Keep proving how your loGIc is on par with a mentally retarded person.
Whatever dude. I haven't tried to prove anything in this thread. I'm just pointing out how your thinking is not the absolute straightforward truth you think it is.