I remember reading about some process they used, I forget the name but I believe normally you need 60 votes but they did something to make it only a simple majority.
I THINK the catch of this process is that the Senators are allowed to vote on any amendments they want, where normally they just are voting on the entire bill.
It’s reconciliation. And the catch is that they can only vote on aspects concerning taxing and spending policy for the government. That is why they couldn’t add the $15 minimum wage. But, any bill can have whatever amendments voted on
No Republicans voted for it, and they couldn't have stopped it. They all voted Nay. The vote was 50-49.
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-ap-top-news-legislation-coronavirus-pandemic-joe-manchin-298ad8c447e9a121ece9529221e83136?
Damn, so how's that work? Is it the whole "going nuclear" thing? Why is simple majority okay here, but not elsewhere?
I remember reading about some process they used, I forget the name but I believe normally you need 60 votes but they did something to make it only a simple majority.
I THINK the catch of this process is that the Senators are allowed to vote on any amendments they want, where normally they just are voting on the entire bill.
I could be wrong about that 2nd part.
It’s reconciliation. And the catch is that they can only vote on aspects concerning taxing and spending policy for the government. That is why they couldn’t add the $15 minimum wage. But, any bill can have whatever amendments voted on
They are using a reconciliation trick to get past filibuster.
Nuclear option. We have Harry Reid to thank for that.
Dan Sullivan of Arkansas abstained. That would’ve made it a split 50-50 vote. Kamala would’ve cast the deciding vote.
Maybe those cowards should have done more to challenge the elections?