I can almost see them getting away with dismissing the existence of the Deep State, but how can they claim BLM protests didn't break down into riots when there are literally thousands of hours and billions in damage from it? Maybe they just assume their audience is full of morons.
Speaking of the Deep State, which leftist publication was it again that said the Deep State is probably real, and they were actually cheering them on because they were impeding President Trump's agenda?
Because the weasel word is ‘widespread’. Doesn’t matter what the intensity was. Doesn’t matter how many billions of dollars in damage was caused when they can say it wasn’t ‘widespread’. There is no technical definition of ‘widespread’ so it can’t be argued with.
I can almost see them getting away with dismissing the existence of the Deep State, but how can they claim BLM protests didn't break down into riots when there are literally thousands of hours and billions in damage from it? Maybe they just assume their audience is full of morons.
Speaking of the Deep State, which leftist publication was it again that said the Deep State is probably real, and they were actually cheering them on because they were impeding President Trump's agenda?
Because the weasel word is ‘widespread’. Doesn’t matter what the intensity was. Doesn’t matter how many billions of dollars in damage was caused when they can say it wasn’t ‘widespread’. There is no technical definition of ‘widespread’ so it can’t be argued with.