1863
Comments (92)
sorted by:
112
strictly1957 112 points ago +112 / -0

In other words did absolutely nothing but destroy small business (as intended)

58
War_Hamster 58 points ago +58 / -0

Don't forget about the dehumanizing demoralization.

And the Antifa disguise affect.

31
StartAgain 31 points ago +31 / -0

i'll never forget the demoralization. it's been horrible. I feel like I'll never be given my normal life back again.

26
War_Hamster 26 points ago +28 / -2

I used to feel that way but I've recently reached the other side. I do not want my old life back. I'm ready for what comes next.

It's liberating. Look forward to seeing you on the other side fren. You'll get here soon enough.

You'll all get here.

18
StartAgain 18 points ago +18 / -0

amen. I hope the end result is old life but better (because now i'm aware of all the issues, communism, agenda 21, etc. & how to make better life decisions now that i'm out of the slavery of a confused mind from blue area).

10
War_Hamster 10 points ago +10 / -0

I think it's a return to the fundamentals that matter and away from all of the pressures that our warped society tries to shove down our throats. I'm still at the early stages of understanding true spiritual freedom, having just recently thrown off the shackles.

I can't believe it was a rap song that pushed me over the top. We live in a very strange reality.

7
StartAgain 7 points ago +7 / -0

yeah i realized just how much the basics (e.g. friendship, memories, nature) matter

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Absolutely. And it's taking off the shackles of bad friendships and not wasting your energy on negativity and other trivial BS.

2
4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fake Woke. I've since watched everyone of his videos 5+ times.

The guy absolutely gets it. He is a free man and is giving the system the bird. I have followed his example. I was already in the fight, but this freed me from the last inhibitions I had. I am 100% against this sickness.

5
ModernKnight 5 points ago +5 / -0

I swing wildly between your position and wanting to suck off my pistol like Kamala with Willie Brown's brown willie. Not going to, I'm too much of a stubborn ass to take the easy way out, but man, it's been a rough year.

10
War_Hamster 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yes, it's been a rough year. I spent more time alone than anyone I know the past year and I barely made it through. A few good friends, my dog, family, and my stubbornness got me through. Well, meeting the based conservative lady hamster a week before lockdowns was probably the biggest factor. We just texted for about 5 months, but she was a godsend.

Hang in there. If you're on this site, you've already passed the hardest tests. Knowing the truth can be hard, but you've already tossed off your shackles. You are free, and that matters.

It gets better, and the end of this movie is glorious if we have the willpower to collectively see it through.

1
ProudWhiteMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Until you realize there's a new virus twice every decade and the reaction to the next unknown virus will be preemptive and we'll be back wearing masks till it's fixed.

8
alfredbester 8 points ago +8 / -0

I encourage you to change your basic outlook. No one will give you back your normal life. You have to create the life and the lifestyle you want.

3
wiombims 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kind of like your ancestors out in the wild did except you have to do it in the concrete jungle.

10
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 10 points ago +10 / -0

The kids in our school district have to wear fucking masks when participating in sports, including track. It's both sad and ridiculous to see them running with masks on. It can't be good for them.

6
Assault-Covfefe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Breathing in your own fetid breath isn't healthy. That's why respirators (the things that actually protect you from harmful airborne contaminates) have an outlet valve. The inlet valves have HEPA filters or other media, such as charcoal, that you need to filter out the bad shit. The outlet valve allows you to exhale and not re-enhale all the CO2, bacteria, and whatever else. (source - I've worn these in previous jobs).

These China made spit tents don't do jack shit. They don't protect you and they don't "protect others" (as the propaganda machine loves to frame it). All they do is prevent your shmoog from splattering onto people in your immediate vicinity. And if you're such an asshole that you sneeze or cough on others, you'll quickly have no friends. Scamdemic or not.

3
kt524 3 points ago +3 / -0

They don't protect you and they don't "protect others"

And my coworker's doctor is forcing her and her husband to wear their masks for their safety and that he'd never lie to them about anything. I just want to bitch slap the whole damn world.

2
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, my wife has to wear a mask all day at work and she has had strep throat and an eye infection over the past few months thanks to the mask.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not good for them. Watch the first 10 minutes of this video: https://patriots.win/p/12hkd8yVSi/mask-whistleblowers-tell-all/c/

7
strictly1957 7 points ago +7 / -0

A full year of social conditioning. The saps that bought this BS shit sandwich are retarded. Someone here posted a great Vice doc on the Chinese Muslims being Shoah'd by the CCP today. Watch if you can!!! Fuck its scary the level of social/societal control there. Think Nazi's x10. Gave me goosebumps because its coming here unless we fight it tooth and nail. The Han Chinese are so brainwashed, just like the pigs who ratted out the Jews and sent them to the camps.

6
Taylor3006 6 points ago +6 / -0

This study tracks with every other study done in the past (pre 2020) where they had studies that showed they helped, and studies that they did not help. The one thing they had in common was they all fell within the margin of error.

3
IvIA6A 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let them get away with mass mail in fraud.

3
strictly1957 3 points ago +3 / -0

As was the plan. The Democrats are the US CCP. Same Godless evil....

51
TrudopesEyebrow [S] 51 points ago +51 / -0

masks appear to wipe out all deaths from cancer, heart disease, flu, pneumonia too.

10
War_Hamster 10 points ago +10 / -0

So......can we conclude that if we wear masks from this point forward for the rest of humanity's existence, we can wipe out all disease?

(I still wouldn't wear one)

8
PleaseHonk 8 points ago +8 / -0

Studies are insanely easy to manipulate.

This “ study” was most certainly performed when the curve was going down.

Imagine the countless other studies that show an increase in positive covid cases AFTER the mandates were put in place!!! Of course CDC cherry picks what it needs.

How many blue states did we see a spike happen after the mandate? Dem states were also testing hundreds of thousands of healthy individuals daily, they fudged their covid death rates so the statistics to any Covid study is absolutely worthless.

3
kt524 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to mention that "cases" =/= Deaths or hospitalizations, hell it doesn't even mean symptoms were occurring.

2
Averon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not to mention the WHO changed their recommendations on how many cycles to use on the PCR tests immediately after Biden took(stole) office.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to mention they are pretty vague about how they're measuring cases. The margin for error is likely a lot greater than they are representing due to that major input issue.

3
NimbleNavigator20202 3 points ago +3 / -0

Absolutely did! Great Post.

24
45FortheWin 24 points ago +24 / -0

Yeah, but you know some idiot will say "if it saved even one life...."

29
jtt888 29 points ago +29 / -0

I always tell those people to stop driving.

13
jubyeonin 13 points ago +13 / -0

Same. We have a better argument there since humans don't have cars as a part of their natural processes.

9
Archmagnus 9 points ago +9 / -0

one saved life = one more bomb dropped on syria

2
flyover_deplorable 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have laws against drunk driving!!! Dur durr!!

2
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those are the same idiots pretending that no one ever died until the WuFlu scamdemic.

3
OWLMAN 3 points ago +3 / -0

And no natural disaster ever occurred prior to "climate change".

19
15
Farnsworth 15 points ago +15 / -0

Wow did they make this report political.

In the actual report:

Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.

However, In the “Discussion” section:

Mask mandates were associated with statistically significant decreases in county-level daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates within 20 days of implementation.

Plus, unless I’m missing it, I don’t see a comparison to a control group, i.e. counties without a mask mandate. That means, the 1% decrease could just be because numbers overall were going down in the summer. If you look at the chart in figure 1, the line was already trending down before the mask mandates.

10
mixednuts86 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, it's data cherry picking and it's very unethical. They've done it through the entire pandemic. You have enough data sets across the country to support any conclusion you want.

8
Viewer01 8 points ago +8 / -0

Louisiana's data proves they don't work. Covid supposedly has a 5-10 day lag. Thus, any measures implemented should lag by 10 or so days. When we locked down in March, took ten days for cases to go down. When we established masks in June, cases peaked and dropped THAT DAY.

5
jubyeonin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nice. The numbers show there is still no proof that masks save lives.

4
mixednuts86 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just wait until we see all the problems that we get from breathing through a dirty bacteria filled rag for 8 hours a day.

14
cyberwar 14 points ago +14 / -0

fact is masks help bacterias from your mouth and nose to get into your lungs. result is death by pneumonia.

11
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 11 points ago +11 / -0

My wife, who has to wear a mask at work, has contracted both strep throat and an eye infection thanks to having to wear a mask all day. She's not the only one either; our optometrist has seen a big increase in conjunctivitis cases since this mask bullshit started.

13
TrudopesEyebrow [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

This is Fauci-sCiEnCe. CNN viewers will gobble it up

7
Jleinf 7 points ago +7 / -0

CDC- Cowards Destroying Civilization

3
PepeTheFrug 3 points ago +3 / -0

China Destroys Civilization

FIFY

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
LoobintheToobin 7 points ago +7 / -0

All that pollution and poison and purchases from chyna for nothing... now add three more forever!!

I say what about the turtles!! Save the turtles ban the masks https://i.maga.host/rr8wcCj.png

Also this crap: Aug 19 2008: by Fauci, “Bacterial Pneumonia Caused Most Deaths in 1918 Influenza Pandemic” https://archive.vn/ORxsb

Jan 25 2021 New Study Finds Masks Hurt Schoolchildren Physically, Psychologically, and Behaviorally https://archive.vn/jkSWS

Masks cause illness. Impetigo and pnemonia (as well as legionaries) https://archive.vn/A1bsw

“Mask mouth” https://archive.vn/zI9Ds

Hospital caused pneumonia? https://archive.vn/jht7x

6
JohnParker1 6 points ago +6 / -0

The CDC is full of crap. The average size of this bug is 105 nanometers. The average size of the holes in the N95 mask is 3 microns. As per MIT, Stanford, and Oxford Universities. 3M says different because they are making money on this. At 105 nanometers.this has and always will blow through any thing that is not totally self contained. It is an airborne virus, make no mistake about that. It's small enough to float in the atmosphere. It has been doing that since it got here. If you read 3M's selling points, don't believe them. Brownian motion only effects energy changes at the atomic and molecular level. Surface tension doesn't work because these things need a fluid.environment to travel in to survive and they seem to make their own fluid environment quite well.

5
spezisthedevil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Does that mean a 1% decrease of the 0.002% death rate? Masks are lame af. People still wearing them are tards.

3
Kingoftheroad 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've heard it as 0.04%. Either way so insignificant. Where can I find an actual number? Is that based on total population or based on the CDC estimate of 10x as many people have had covid as were tested positive?

5
spezisthedevil 5 points ago +5 / -0

I heard that the survival rate for healthy people without comorbitities is >99.998%. Even if it's less, with the PCR testing false positives, and the 'dying with covid' vs. 'dying of covid' classification system for covid deaths, the real number is somewhere between 0.02 - 0.04%, if not less. 1% of that number is essentially zero.

Masks are fake and gay, and are only being used as a visual cue to reinforce the idea that a ''pandemic'' is happening, because without the mask as a reminder, the sheep would quickly forget about this nothingburger common cold virus (...that can rarely cause a fatal pneumonia type condition in people who are so sick that the first opportunistic virus or bacteria that they come into contact with would be the final straw for them, ...and is certainly not worth the mass quarantine of healthy people, ...or shutting down our economy, ...or scaring the shit out of children and psychologically torturing them by teaching them they are dirty, isolating them, and forcing them to cover their faces with a dirty rag.)

5
Viewer01 5 points ago +5 / -0

That decrease is from folks like me who literally would rather sit at home then go out in public with a mask on.

1
loveshock 1 point ago +1 / -0

SO YOU"RE SAYING THEY WORK?

5
Kingoftheroad 5 points ago +5 / -0

Notice how they label it as significant when even if it's 3%, that if you take the numbers at face value and as fact, then we would only have ~510k deaths as of now if we wore masks the whole time and permanently shuttered the doors of thousands more businesses and millions more jobs and people's savings. Oh ya let's ruin millions of people's credit, savings, businesses, and jobs to save 15,000 people's lives (supposedly) and let's fast track vaccines without proper examination but let's never get around to fast tracking therapeutics like Ivermectin, Hydroxichloriquine, etc.because there MIGHT be a risk but we care so much about saving lives that we won't risk using medication that may save them

5
Mouthpounder 5 points ago +5 / -0

Interpretation- there is no statistical significance between the variables being tested. Or in other words, masks don’t do shit

4
RandoBudster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well this seems like a convenient time to figure that out. Few states declare freedom and CDD jumps into action.

4
Apocrs 4 points ago +4 / -0

This coming from the same bullshit organization that blindly followed the WHO that told the world the CCP virus didn't come from China, wasn't able to be transferred from person to person, wasn't air born, and didn't require a mask.

4
Celtic_Warrior 4 points ago +4 / -0

We’ve known for months now that mask mandates don’t result in a statistically significant difference in the reported number of “Covid cases”.

And what about the people who suffer from a weakened immune system due to all the mask wearing which lowers your oxygen levels? What about the people who got mask mouth which can cause gum disease which can lead to a myriad of other health issues including stroke?

Let’s not just sweep the harmful effects of mask wearing under the rug.

4
yukondave 4 points ago +4 / -0

The WHO reported their views on masks in 2019, using data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) – the gold standard.

‘Ten RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, and there was no evidence that facemasks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.’

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf?ua=1

Since then, there has only been one RCT done on COVID19 transmission, in Denmark. It did not find any significant benefit from masks in reducing spread.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33205991/

4
UsurperJoe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have You ever seen that motherfucker Bill Gates wearva mask?

He needs to be cancelled.

4
p1smo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Let's fall to pieces and change our whole way of life for a 1.5% statistic that's likely to be inaccurate! TrUsT tHe ScIEnCe!!

3
pelt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks like no matter what... the curves are the same. If you're not on Tom Woods mailing list yet, you should be.

https://i.imgur.com/gxoZHy3.gif

https://i.imgur.com/YYQqEtQ.gif

3
31seconds 3 points ago +3 / -0

Uh that's not what that section of text says. It says all effects were significant.

3
leakmouth 3 points ago +3 / -0

mAsKs sAvE LiVeS

3
IvIA6A 3 points ago +3 / -0

How long before this gets banned for misinformation? We have to listen to the experts and the science!

2
Juzeza 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tyranny

2
npcipede 2 points ago +2 / -0

We reached herd immunity 6 months ago.

COVID had spread across the globe prior to November 2019.

The "leaked" videos from China were fabricated lies.

Change my mind.

2
Desktop 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's funny that they pretend that anyone cares about what they have to say.

2
LordCunnart 2 points ago +5 / -3

A p value of less than or equal to 0.05 shows the result is statistically significant. It indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis (no change in effect) as there is a less than 5% probability the null is correct (and the results are random). Therefore we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. It says there was a big enough difference in the before and after too show the masks made a difference. I'm not debating anything else of it, I think masks are bollocks, the study could also be bollocks, we just should be accurate that this clip, as presented says masks made it better, not that they made no difference.

4
31seconds 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah that section of text does not back up what was said in the tweet.

3
idkfa 3 points ago +3 / -0

And the saddest part is that you're downvoted for a perfectly accurate statement.

2
KeeptheChief 2 points ago +2 / -0

How can they possibly prove that? Trust the science, it's a perfectly cromulent study that embiggens us all.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
awsure 2 points ago +2 / -0

All the muzzle mandate did was push me and the many non muzzlers to lay low for awhile. We probably lowered the freakin infection rate of everything by staying incognito

2
EagleOverTriumph 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have these results been buried yet? I remember the last set of CDC data got yeeted from the antisocial media like Twitter and Facebook because it doesn't fit the narrative.

2
LoneWolfsBigIgloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Crazy thing is, many people I know don't care about the actual statistics. They only care what the media says....Sad!

1
Friend_of_John_Galt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Source? I'd like to put this in the hands of decision makers and a social media post won't do.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
BingHard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can I get a link to the report please?

1
ILoveSilk 1 point ago +3 / -2

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7010e3.htm

I didn't find the statement of "The results are inside the margin for statistical error" in CDC weekly report.

I would question Breaking911's credibility

1
FreedomOrDeath 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone have the link this on the cdc website? I can't find it :(

1
hillaryprison 1 point ago +2 / -1

It didn't do anything. But it did make people feel 'protected' so they would fail to socially distance which actually does increase the spread. Also, stupid stores like walmart and grocery stores closed one of their exists so everyone had to funnel together like cattle and the other 'non essential' businesses shut down made even more people at these stores, which yet further increased the spread. The whole frickin thing backfired.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
-1
AmericanJawa -1 points ago +1 / -2

So the CDC is admitting that the effect of mask mandates is statistically insignificant.