Im on both sides of the fence. On the one hand, it was great for him to be able to communicate directly to all his supporters all around the world, and get the truth out there, when the media would not cover all the good things he was doing.
On the other hand, i didnt understand why he was so obsessed at hitting back at nobody leftists in hollywood and music. You're the President, your going to have people give you crap, that comes with the turf. If i was President, i could care less what those self righteous losers in hollywood thought of me, i wouldnt waste my time and energy hitting back at them on twitter.
Also, and this is just my opinion, his tweet during the rioting last year when he said when the looting starts the shooting starts, although entirely true as people ended up dying from being shot at, was unnecessary. All it did was give ammunition to the left to beat him over the head with.
In the whole washup, would anything have been different if he wasnt on Twitter at all?
Im curious to see what others peoples take is on his using twitter.
Definitely good.
GOOD.
It was good. Trump is still living in their heads "Rent Free". Can't stop the Maga movement.
With no actual media available, what choice did he have? I agree that idiots should be ignored.
his son Jnr could have started a social media company,, couldnt he?
Why should Trump try to play by the rules when they just change the rules to benefit them?
Overall, good. Twitter gave him that direct access to the people, allowing him to bypass virtually every corporate media gatekeeper. It drove them absolutely insane.
However, once Twitter began censoring and suppressing his tweets, he should have spun up accounts on alt tech platforms. This goes for anyone who uses social media for work, advertising, or messaging; diversify your social media yesterday.
Those self righteous losers in Hollywoo are PEDOPHILES. And the NFL traffics children. We can't play nice with them.