Don't go on a tangent. We have free speech. It led to this. Therefore, it's better to limit what liberals have to say. Listen, they get it. It works. Why won't you get it?
Okay, so who decides what legal speech is? A vote by the people? A vote by a panel of appointed people? A vote by two competing factions of political people? One man? Who?
First, can we agree that all speech should not be allowed because of its effects? We can see what it does, right? Agree to that first and we can begin the next step. Just do one step at a time.
Then you are part of the problem. You're a liberal. Do you understand that now? You're not going to conserve anything. Money means nothing. This society isn't about money. If you let people say whatever you want, this is the society you get. It's that simple.
What speech should be illegal?
Where do you want to even start? How about making it illegal to speak positively about pedophilia for a start? How does that sound?
Don't go on a tangent. We have free speech. It led to this. Therefore, it's better to limit what liberals have to say. Listen, they get it. It works. Why won't you get it?
Okay, so who decides what legal speech is? A vote by the people? A vote by a panel of appointed people? A vote by two competing factions of political people? One man? Who?
First, can we agree that all speech should not be allowed because of its effects? We can see what it does, right? Agree to that first and we can begin the next step. Just do one step at a time.
I will not concede that. What speech is it that must be limited or illegal, in your opinion? Hones question. No bull.
Then you are part of the problem. You're a liberal. Do you understand that now? You're not going to conserve anything. Money means nothing. This society isn't about money. If you let people say whatever you want, this is the society you get. It's that simple.
What speech should be illegal?
Where do you want to even start? How about making it illegal to speak positively about pedophilia for a start? How does that sound?