22
Comments (78)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
E-dantes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, so who decides what legal speech is? A vote by the people? A vote by a panel of appointed people? A vote by two competing factions of political people? One man? Who?

-1
DodoBird -1 points ago +1 / -2

First, can we agree that all speech should not be allowed because of its effects? We can see what it does, right? Agree to that first and we can begin the next step. Just do one step at a time.

1
E-dantes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will not concede that. What speech is it that must be limited or illegal, in your opinion? Hones question. No bull.

-1
DodoBird -1 points ago +1 / -2

Then you are part of the problem. You're a liberal. Do you understand that now? You're not going to conserve anything. Money means nothing. This society isn't about money. If you let people say whatever you want, this is the society you get. It's that simple.

What speech should be illegal?

Where do you want to even start? How about making it illegal to speak positively about pedophilia for a start? How does that sound?

1
E-dantes 1 point ago +1 / -0

So rather than point out the evils and self perpetuating cycles of abuse, causality of suicide for victims...etc..... you just want to make it illegal to talk about. And when it is illegal to talk about and an evil judge who has been hiding the abuse of his daughter for years, because it is illegal to talk about, has a victim step forward to make an accusation against someone else, yet is fined for speaking out about pedophelia.......see what I am saying. What happens when that limitation is turned against you. Like guns. Used to be be if you had to conceal it, you were a chickenshit, and most likely a criminal. Now the mere posession of a gun, makes you a potentially violent person in the eyes of a society that has been taught the exact reverse of what it means to own a firearm.,