22
Comments (78)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
E-dantes 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lost me at talking and getting arrested for it. That is fascism, and yes, by the standards put forth by our founding fathers, and the original definition of the word, I am a liberal. And you're a despot seeking totalitarian control. Seeking to control the very sounds that a being can emit from a couple of muscles and airflow. Just give them a mask right?

-3
DodoBird -3 points ago +0 / -3

So, are you calling President Lincoln a fascist? He locked up reporters. Who cares what you call it? Do you want it fixed or not? You have this mental block you cannot get passed. It's so strange. Does it matter what it's called? Do you want to save our society or do you think it's okay for everyone to just say whatever they want? Because if you do, this is what you get. This fucking clownworld nightmare. You cannot have it both ways.

Stop worry about your little titles about what it is. It's about saving society. You are a cuck. Read yourself. Go read. You would rather live in clownworld than for some of us to have power and to remove this crap from our society. You would rather have faggots marching in parades half naked or fully naked. That's what you want. That's freedom, right?

No. Fuck that. Freedom is being free from that shit. That's freedom.

1
E-dantes 1 point ago +1 / -0

False equivalence. Reporters deliberately reporting false information is propaganda. And was at the time illegal. Using a position of power to manipulate the populous is illegal. People marching in states of undress used to be illegal according to decency laws and is not a legitimate form of free speech, in that it could, and does, subject innocent persons, children, to things they should not be exposed to. Their brains are not fully developed in order to understand what is going on. Words are words, and speech is an idea put into vocal or print format. Visualizations of an obscene nature are not speech regardless of what the supreme court says. It's a twist of a definition based on a lie.

-5
DodoBird -5 points ago +0 / -5

I never said reporters. You keep adding things. Over and over. You keep doing it. Stop doing that. It's like you can't debate in good faith.

Using a position of power to manipulate people is illegal? Do you know what politics is about? Holy shit, kiddo.

You have not thought this through at all, have you?