Tbh that's really reading between the lines. There are many reasons to be concerned about these vaccines. I don't think them trying to explain vaccine development in terms of technology people are more familiar with is something we should argue over.
You really don't need to read between the lines or try to scavenge for company memos to find a good reason to be concerned about these vaccines. The fact that they've been approves 5x faster than anything before and 9x faster than average is more than enough to raise red flags, and people that have anything approaching common sense. No point in arguing with the others anyway
Tbh that's really reading between the lines. There are many reasons to be concerned about these vaccines. I don't think them trying to explain vaccine development in terms of technology people are more familiar with is something we should argue over.
You really don't need to read between the lines or try to scavenge for company memos to find a good reason to be concerned about these vaccines. The fact that they've been approves 5x faster than anything before and 9x faster than average is more than enough to raise red flags, and people that have anything approaching common sense. No point in arguing with the others anyway
Exactly. They are trying to relate the mRNA back to a more common computer term: a program.
This is nothing worth hyping