sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.