Kissenger has some advice for Biden - Trump nailed it. Don't screw it up -
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (51)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Hard to show you a simple one source, when it takes 20 hours+ of data just to get someone up to speed.
I'm not looking at this from a blind perspective. I've studied this man. The optics makes it look like he served Nixon, it's the other way around. Nixon had to bend his knees for kissinger.
It should be noted Mao and the CCP didn't come to power on their own. They had other people from the west to setup the CCP. More than likely these people are still in control in the background to this day. But we only chinese faces in our perspective, but those people like sidney rittenberg were in full control in the Nixon era.
He is always in support of a NWO and Liberal World Order.
Also, how does this one guy seem to involve himself in every single US presidency? Why does he get to be the one that influences US foreign policy every time?
So basically "everything's fake and the NWO controls both sides ever and always."
I dunno man. I'm willing to be open minded but you're just giving me really broad strokes and then saying Kissinger is the master mind behind it all. I could ask you the same questions: yeah, why him? I tend to think his successes and relative effectiveness in diplomacy is why he proliferates but again I'm open to alternative theories just give me some kind of meat here.
GHW Bush and many others were against this. The Soviets and other communists presumably were against normalizing relations with China. The Taiwanese were against it. The Japanese and Koreans were against normalizing relations. The JFK/Cold Warrior Democrat crowd was also against it. The media was largely skeptical and critical of it. Goldwater Conservatives were critical, normie liberals were critical, hippies were critical. So again if anything close to what you're saying is true then basically the Cold War was a complete farce so both the Cold War and anti-Cold War crowd were in on it.
Yes, Henry Kissinger is and was a globalist. However, the term globalist means something completely different in the context of bipolarity that existed under the terms of the Cold War. You seem to be living in an alternate timeline where the US isolates themselves trade and military wise and somehow is in a better place than we are now and not under the boot of literal communist oppression and/or occupation.
I never said that he was the master mind of it all. I am saying he has huge influence. Especially on foreign policy.
At the end of the day the Federal Reserve Bank is a privately owned bank, with private owners. They control the money supply of the entire nation. More than likely kissinger is well connected to those people.
Also, do you think we have a two party system? Two parties are for us, for them it is a uni-party. Only a few people in DC seem to be outside of the uni-party.
Overall, I think the best bet for you to get the macro 50,000ft view of what is happening is through someone like Alan Watt who can explain it more succinctly than myself: https://www.bitchute.com/video/IUACnMXS4uWp/
Ok thanks for the Alan Watt source I will check it out.
I think we have uni-party and the neoliberal opposition to the Cold War was a big part of really solidifying that within America's borders. I do think it's hard to say Nixon was a huge part of it though, considering how many people in the establishment hated his fucking guts and vice versa. I'd accept he was a pawn, sure, but even that seems a little questionable and you'd wonder why he was removed then. It's not like they did better under Ford or Carter.
As for Kissinger, he's always seemed like an any-port-in-the-storm diplomat but that doesn't make him evil or a bad actor I think a lot of guys over the years fit this billing. I guess in the sense that globalists beget more globalism, but the OP in this thread is HK praising Trump so I don't get how you square that (unless DJT also involved).
Before WW2 I think we had two distinct parties but since the end of the war it is certainly much harder to tell. A lot of that is the NATO scam though. However, that doesn't mean literally everyone who has power is knowingly part of the cabal. In reality I think it's more like how organized crime works in that you have several different bodies and alliances, rivalries, etc. are formed/dissolved/accelerated over time.
Naturally I'm a fed skeptic as well and certainly Nixon and Kissinger have their fair share of totally valid detractors on a number of issues. I just tend to think most of Nixon's moves were done for the sake of improving the lot of this country, whether or not they all worked out in the end. I'd tend to put JFK in that category as well but he's obviously way more corrupt. Not saying Nixon was clean either.