sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
they can say whatever they want about what straight is or isn't. we shouldn't let them get away with that. we should not let them get away with redefining straight to include people who fuck trannies. it's fucking stupid.
this is what they do, they use language as a weapon against us. they sit around all day inventing new words or co-opting existing words and pushing their new language onto us, like they saw 1984 as an instruction manual.
for example they have tricked a huge % of the population to actually go along with the idea that the word "gender" somehow means something separate and different from the word "sex". so now we live in a world where "sex" means biological sex (your chromosomes) and "gender" means "how you feel". which is complete fucking bullshit. and people just casually accepted that one.
but if you go to google or wherever and type in "etymology" (the history of words" and "gender" you will quickly see that the word gender was 100% interchangeable with the word sex, for hundreds of years. they meant exactly the same thing, and it was always tied in with biology.
and common sense would tell you that that is the case. why would anyone 100yrs ago have had any need for a special word that is all to do with "how you feel with regards to your sex"? go back in time and ask any average random person if they feel like a boy or a girl, separate from what they actually are, and they'll look at you like you're a fucking weirdo. that whole concept didn't even exist back then, at least not in any socially accepted way. there was no need for a word meaning anything like what they tell us "gender" means now. and it never did mean that. they stole the fucking word, and we let them.
the thing that burns me up the worst is when i see normal, non-freako people actually using the "word" "cisgender". so, some lgbt/femenist freako just decides that NORMAL PEOPLE need a label, and THEY should be the ones allowed to invent it. to decide what WE get to be called. and how convenient, that their word for normal people also sounds like "sissy". i'm sure that was pure coincidence and not at all intentional. and sometimes non-freakos actually use that fucking word, playing right into the left's hands, helping them redefine our society by taking control of language itself.
STRAIGHT means and always has meant the same thing- fucking STRAIGHT.
of course you do. if it's not packaged in a meme with a picture and a mere sentence fragment, you don't want any part of it. complete thoughts? nah, i'll pass. right?
in memes with pictures sentence fragments and impact font, you mean.
sorry pal, complex thoughts or even sometimes simpler, yet complete ones, actually require full sentences. hell, sometimes you even gotta bust out these things called paragraphs.
i expressed myself perfectly clearly. only problem is this place is full of low IQ people. for example, the majority sentiment in this place was that trump, absolutely, 100% WAS definitely going to remain in the office of president, and people were holding that attitude all the way up into january. with no proof, no reason, no signs, no court victories, nothing. to the contrary, we had proof that the republican party would do nothing to help him, RINOs were showing their true colors, and judges were already refusing to let any one single case make it to court.
and yet if you pointed any of this out, that it wasn't looking good, you were called a DOOMER.
that's how unfortunately fucking stupid a lot of people here are.
so i totally am not surprised that full sentences or anything but memes are hard to digest around here. maybe we'd win if people actually had the brain power to discuss more complicated thoughts and ideas around here?
yeah but when someone doesn't exactly want to engage in a deep dialogue, you should just respect that as opposed to jumping straight into personal insults and ad hominems. take care ;)
Hey, you saying only ancaps can be superstraight you Bigot???
That's super capitalist, at least!
Wrong colors, but good meme!
is this just a cleverly disguised anarcho capitalism meme?
I'm Super Straight Level 2, I only date women who were women in all their past reincarnations as well.
Proud bois colors? Ffs, cia informants, glowing anuses. Lil Pepe deserves better
Proud bois aren't ancap
Proud boys are Black and Gold.
Ancaps are Black and Yellow.
Super Straight is Black and Orange. They have their own holiday at the end of October.
their flag looks like the orange lodge... hmmmmmm.....
sorry but this whole "super straight" thing is actually kind of stupid. i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
yeah but they claim straight is normal, and not protected. add the word super to it, and boom.
none of this actually addresses anything i said.
i said we shouldn't give up on the word straight.
they can say whatever they want about what straight is or isn't. we shouldn't let them get away with that. we should not let them get away with redefining straight to include people who fuck trannies. it's fucking stupid.
this is what they do, they use language as a weapon against us. they sit around all day inventing new words or co-opting existing words and pushing their new language onto us, like they saw 1984 as an instruction manual.
for example they have tricked a huge % of the population to actually go along with the idea that the word "gender" somehow means something separate and different from the word "sex". so now we live in a world where "sex" means biological sex (your chromosomes) and "gender" means "how you feel". which is complete fucking bullshit. and people just casually accepted that one.
but if you go to google or wherever and type in "etymology" (the history of words" and "gender" you will quickly see that the word gender was 100% interchangeable with the word sex, for hundreds of years. they meant exactly the same thing, and it was always tied in with biology.
and common sense would tell you that that is the case. why would anyone 100yrs ago have had any need for a special word that is all to do with "how you feel with regards to your sex"? go back in time and ask any average random person if they feel like a boy or a girl, separate from what they actually are, and they'll look at you like you're a fucking weirdo. that whole concept didn't even exist back then, at least not in any socially accepted way. there was no need for a word meaning anything like what they tell us "gender" means now. and it never did mean that. they stole the fucking word, and we let them.
the thing that burns me up the worst is when i see normal, non-freako people actually using the "word" "cisgender". so, some lgbt/femenist freako just decides that NORMAL PEOPLE need a label, and THEY should be the ones allowed to invent it. to decide what WE get to be called. and how convenient, that their word for normal people also sounds like "sissy". i'm sure that was pure coincidence and not at all intentional. and sometimes non-freakos actually use that fucking word, playing right into the left's hands, helping them redefine our society by taking control of language itself.
STRAIGHT means and always has meant the same thing- fucking STRAIGHT.
I refuse to read that
of course you do. if it's not packaged in a meme with a picture and a mere sentence fragment, you don't want any part of it. complete thoughts? nah, i'll pass. right?
no I just think you should be able to express yourself more clearly and concisely
in memes with pictures sentence fragments and impact font, you mean.
sorry pal, complex thoughts or even sometimes simpler, yet complete ones, actually require full sentences. hell, sometimes you even gotta bust out these things called paragraphs.
i expressed myself perfectly clearly. only problem is this place is full of low IQ people. for example, the majority sentiment in this place was that trump, absolutely, 100% WAS definitely going to remain in the office of president, and people were holding that attitude all the way up into january. with no proof, no reason, no signs, no court victories, nothing. to the contrary, we had proof that the republican party would do nothing to help him, RINOs were showing their true colors, and judges were already refusing to let any one single case make it to court.
and yet if you pointed any of this out, that it wasn't looking good, you were called a DOOMER.
that's how unfortunately fucking stupid a lot of people here are.
so i totally am not surprised that full sentences or anything but memes are hard to digest around here. maybe we'd win if people actually had the brain power to discuss more complicated thoughts and ideas around here?
yeah but when someone doesn't exactly want to engage in a deep dialogue, you should just respect that as opposed to jumping straight into personal insults and ad hominems. take care ;)
or just keep puffing yourself up, I don't really care
You're an excellent sleep aid.
you're a nothing master.