No court heard any evidence dealing with substance. I don't remember any witnesses being sworn in to give testimony to the election fraud they said they saw, do you? I don't recall any unbiased examination of the evidence or allegations. Do you? The court said we have no standing, latches, moot, or our allegations were speculatative. Actually, because of the lack of any examination of the evidence it was the courts assumptions that the election had integrity that was speculative.