If you're a Superstraight male you're only attracted to women who were born as women and vice versa. It's been a lomg, hard-fought battlenover these last few days, but finally we can be brave in the face of oppression.
I'm great. I'm superstraight. And I control my fate.
The left has been trying to shove the "Trans" thing down everyone's throat but a very clever individual came up with the idea of making "Super Straight", meaning someone who's only attracted to the opposite sex (not Trans), a gender "choice" like the other 50 or so. The left have just been hoisted on their own petard!
i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
I hear you. And you’re right. I also think it’s hilarious because it uses “their” rules and logic against them and proves how fucking idiotic it all is anyways. I don’t care what someone does or thinks they are. But they don’t get to define who I am. I think anything that turns the tables on them, is fine by me.
but giving up the word 'straight' to allow them to redefine "straight" as including men who fuck trannies, isn't "turning the tables on them".
abandoning "straight", giving up on straight, and leaving it to them to redefine however they want, and running to a new, stupider label for ourselves, is not turning the tables on them. it's helping them win.
This is us unloading a meme barrage and advancing in the culture war
I can see that. What did it start from?
4chan and tiktok autists.
If you're a Superstraight male you're only attracted to women who were born as women and vice versa. It's been a lomg, hard-fought battlenover these last few days, but finally we can be brave in the face of oppression.
I'm great. I'm superstraight. And I control my fate.
Haha AMAZING
The left has been trying to shove the "Trans" thing down everyone's throat but a very clever individual came up with the idea of making "Super Straight", meaning someone who's only attracted to the opposite sex (not Trans), a gender "choice" like the other 50 or so. The left have just been hoisted on their own petard!
Fight absurdity with absurdity.
Ahhh and they’re melting down I bet
it's really fucking stupid, is what it is.
i get that it's being done to piss off libs by being confrontational, but the stupid irony of it is that it's actually playing right into the left's hands.
we don't need some new label to describe not wanting to fuck a fake woman who has a dick or a big gash wound where a dick used to be. we already have a label for that.
it's just called being straight.
a) it would've pissed off the left MORE, had people just make a point of saying something like "i'm straight and straight men don't fuck chicks with or who ever had dicks".
b) by instead picking a new label, in essence what you are doing is abandoning the label of 'straight' to the left, and thus making it easier for them to get away with spreading the notion that "straight" people can in fact fuck trannies.
c) you should've picked simply the word "straight" as the "hill to die on", not gave it up, not went for some new hill to call your own, some new, much smaller, stupider hill of "super straight". why the fuck should we admit defeat over what "straight" means? fight for simply being straight and insisting that trannies are not part of what it means to be straight.
in short, this whole thing is fucking gay. and counterproductive. it helps accomplish the goals of the left.
I hear you. And you’re right. I also think it’s hilarious because it uses “their” rules and logic against them and proves how fucking idiotic it all is anyways. I don’t care what someone does or thinks they are. But they don’t get to define who I am. I think anything that turns the tables on them, is fine by me.
but giving up the word 'straight' to allow them to redefine "straight" as including men who fuck trannies, isn't "turning the tables on them".
abandoning "straight", giving up on straight, and leaving it to them to redefine however they want, and running to a new, stupider label for ourselves, is not turning the tables on them. it's helping them win.
I also agree with that. But I haven’t given up using anything. I don’t let anyone define me but me