3702
Comments (86)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
48
ArtPunk138 48 points ago +51 / -3

Maybe this is what they used against him in the end

46
deleted 46 points ago +46 / -0
27
leo-bulero 27 points ago +27 / -0

They got rid of Ross Perot by threatening his grandkids so I wouldn’t be surprised.

18
Afeazo 18 points ago +18 / -0

Maybe it is why they threatened to get rid of his secret service proteciton.

15
Major_Nutt 15 points ago +15 / -0

To be fair, he could probably hire better security.

8
Datamancer 8 points ago +8 / -0

Better and quite frankly more than a few would work for per diem only.

7
PN_OShea 7 points ago +7 / -0

The line starts here...

15
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 15 points ago +15 / -0

I have no doubt.

A father’s love for his children knows no bounds.

Every one of these sociopaths must be hunted down and crucified. We must learn to become as ruthless and vigilant as they are.

9
hansgruber7 9 points ago +10 / -1

Even if they didn't, it's probably why he chose not to go down fighting. I don't blame him. No one had his back.

5
PN_OShea 5 points ago +5 / -0

....we do. We may not know what we have to do ("Trust the Plan...". Ugh), so use clear, small words.

But we've got his back however we can.