Yeah this situation is ultra-shitty so far as I'm concerned. I mean think about it this way, if a 16 year old was shown nude but "was playing an 18 year old" that excuse wouldn't fly--it would still be child porn. Even if the viewer was led to believe everything was legit/ok, it would still be wrong. Now reverse the direction, and have someone who is of age be depicted as someone who is a minor, showing nudity, and that's supposed to be ok? No, the woman isn't legally a minor but the viewer believes she is. This is a messed up situation.
That movie is trash all around and everyone involved in its production, publication, marketing, and release should be ashamed.
There was an 18 year old portraying a younger girl that pulled her shirt up and flashed a tit
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt9196192/parentalguide/nudity
Yeah this situation is ultra-shitty so far as I'm concerned. I mean think about it this way, if a 16 year old was shown nude but "was playing an 18 year old" that excuse wouldn't fly--it would still be child porn. Even if the viewer was led to believe everything was legit/ok, it would still be wrong. Now reverse the direction, and have someone who is of age be depicted as someone who is a minor, showing nudity, and that's supposed to be ok? No, the woman isn't legally a minor but the viewer believes she is. This is a messed up situation.
That movie is trash all around and everyone involved in its production, publication, marketing, and release should be ashamed.
Have you ever seen American Beauty?
The actress was 20 years old when that came out and was depicting a highschool senior we can assume is 17 or 18 years old.
She was 16...
The meme is still incorrect. It says that she is underage, not depicting an underage.