Conservatives want to reproduce and carry on their family and American traditions.
LGBT, their family tree ends with them. Thousands of generations, warriors, peasants, kings, and poets, all to end with them because they were indoctrinated to be attracted to the wrong hole.
Conservative gay couples who adopt a child and raise that child to carry on their family and American traditions and don't brainwash them with BS, is far better than a straight leftist couple who force hormones down their sons throat cause they wanted a daughter, and teach them to hate America and everything it stands for.
By your logic, a straight couple who cannot have kids, who adopt, their family tree ends with them too. Sure, the adopted child might not be their blood, but they'll still carry the family name and traditions.
Conservatives hold many issues that are important to them. Not all of them are the same as all of the others. My husband and I had a strong desire to have a family, but we also knew (at that time) that a kid up for adoption would most likely go to a straight couple, and that would be an easier life for that kid, so we never adopted. We became the best possible uncles for our nieces and nephews. I would bet that we would agree with most every other conservative issue.
Read up on what conservatism means and then circle back when you're all read up.
Preservation of a family unit is but one aspect of conservatism, and we can agree to work to uphold that principle while dealing with our own shit. But if you think that after what the Supreme Court did, conservatives can afford to pick and choose allies who otherwise are fully onboard, you're out of your league and are asking to have your values rekt and never again upheld in this country.
Deal with that shit later. This is the time to call it, all aboard.
Then toss freedom of association enshrined in the Constitution right out of the window.
Just because some people don't have the traditional family themselves doesn't mean they are trying to undermine the institution and doesn't mean they can't work to assist in preserving the right to maintain it.
A mother and father in the home is the most ideal situation, but as long as there are kids who can't get that, there is going to be a need for two parent households that are safe, and many of those households are conservative and value raising children who will be able to recognize the need for traditional two parent households.
The truth is, right now isn't the time to play petty games and turn people away who have the same fundamental beliefs and principles.
But it seems like you're willing to let that slip away.
I mean technically the first three could be conservative if they have traditional relationships and don tact on their degeneracy. The fourth group is mentally ill and shouldnt have any say in politics.
There's no such thing as an LGBT conservative.
Conservatives want to reproduce and carry on their family and American traditions.
LGBT, their family tree ends with them. Thousands of generations, warriors, peasants, kings, and poets, all to end with them because they were indoctrinated to be attracted to the wrong hole.
Conservative gay couples who adopt a child and raise that child to carry on their family and American traditions and don't brainwash them with BS, is far better than a straight leftist couple who force hormones down their sons throat cause they wanted a daughter, and teach them to hate America and everything it stands for.
By your logic, a straight couple who cannot have kids, who adopt, their family tree ends with them too. Sure, the adopted child might not be their blood, but they'll still carry the family name and traditions.
Conservatives hold many issues that are important to them. Not all of them are the same as all of the others. My husband and I had a strong desire to have a family, but we also knew (at that time) that a kid up for adoption would most likely go to a straight couple, and that would be an easier life for that kid, so we never adopted. We became the best possible uncles for our nieces and nephews. I would bet that we would agree with most every other conservative issue.
Sure, bud.
Read up on what conservatism means and then circle back when you're all read up.
Preservation of a family unit is but one aspect of conservatism, and we can agree to work to uphold that principle while dealing with our own shit. But if you think that after what the Supreme Court did, conservatives can afford to pick and choose allies who otherwise are fully onboard, you're out of your league and are asking to have your values rekt and never again upheld in this country.
Deal with that shit later. This is the time to call it, all aboard.
Then toss freedom of association enshrined in the Constitution right out of the window.
Just because some people don't have the traditional family themselves doesn't mean they are trying to undermine the institution and doesn't mean they can't work to assist in preserving the right to maintain it.
A mother and father in the home is the most ideal situation, but as long as there are kids who can't get that, there is going to be a need for two parent households that are safe, and many of those households are conservative and value raising children who will be able to recognize the need for traditional two parent households.
The truth is, right now isn't the time to play petty games and turn people away who have the same fundamental beliefs and principles.
But it seems like you're willing to let that slip away.
This is how you lose.
I mean technically the first three could be conservative if they have traditional relationships and don tact on their degeneracy. The fourth group is mentally ill and shouldnt have any say in politics.