4476
Comments (488)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
20
AmericaFloats 20 points ago +20 / -0

why would there not be an acquittal? if jurors refuse to agree?

15
Drwuzer 15 points ago +16 / -1

Never forget OJ. That jury was scared to death after the rodney king riots 2 years earlier. Only reason OJ got off.

9
AbsurdOpinion 9 points ago +10 / -1

OJ was covering for his son Jason who was the actual murderer.

  • Jason had a record of attacking people with a knife, including an ex-girlfriend, current girlfriend, and his boss.
  • He was also supposed to be on antipsychotic meds to treat his irrational rage issues that he had stopped taking in the weeks before the murders.
  • Jason's knife (he had military hand to hand weapon training) fit the wound patterns while OJ's knife did not.
  • Jason was also pissed off at Nicole for not coming to his restaurant the day of the murder and was known to have a "love-hate" relationship with her.

There's a lot more, but this is rather telling - OJ hired a criminal defense lawyer for Jason just days after the murder when OJ was the ONLY suspect.

Things that make you go "Hmmm...."

2
OVERMENSCH 2 points ago +2 / -0

The blood DNA match to OJ wouldn't have been as precise a match if it had been his son's blood at the scene.