They had sound cases. Unauthorized, illegal changes to election laws by unauthorized state administrators is itself an overwhelming case.
As far as evidence, you have 270 pages worth in Sydney Powell's documentation and three volumes of the Navarro Report not to mention a humongous list of evidence at hereistheevidence.com
You could possibly have a good argument that they poorly laid out the cases. But you'd have to elaborate some. Perhaps you already posted it somewhere else.
I admittedly did not read all the court filings. Nor am I an attorney.
They had sound cases. Unauthorized, illegal changes to election laws by unauthorized state administrators is itself an overwhelming case.
As far as evidence, you have 270 pages worth in Sydney Powell's documentation and three volumes of the Navarro Report not to mention a humongous list of evidence at hereistheevidence.com
https://navarroreport.com/#342e5f15-d44c-436a-bb58-9051a9397783
https://wpcdn.zenger.news/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/24190822/2020-12-23-Sidney-Powell-Team-Binder-ZENGER-NEWS.pdf
Read it all and then come back here and tell me why you think none of it is evidence of fraud or solicitation of fraud.
And read all the evidence in context of just how narrow the supposed margin of victories were in swing states. https://i.postimg.cc/rmyTTLLC/Fraud-Votes.png
Well,
You could possibly have a good argument that they poorly laid out the cases. But you'd have to elaborate some. Perhaps you already posted it somewhere else.
I admittedly did not read all the court filings. Nor am I an attorney.