You're right if you consider "Northern California" to be North of Sacramento. That's like a third of the state by landmass, and probably like 10% by population.
A Southern Californian might lump the SF Bay Area and Sacramento into "Northern California," or more likely "NorCal," but generally people from the Bay or central coast wouldn't consider themselves to be in "Northern California" as opposed to southern the same way southerners would.
There's a difference between "Northern California" and "Not Southern California."
The average Californian probably can't name a single town between Sacramento and Oregon. That's "Northern California." Sacramento is like 2/3rds the way up the state. That whole area (excluding Sacramento itself), and a lot of the inland of California, are the rural "based" areas.
Almost no one would call San Francisco "Northern California." More likely the region would be referred to as "The Bay," "The Bay Area," or "SF."
Someone might include the bay area as part of "NorCal," in the context of "As opposed to Southern California," probably in the context of universities. But the connotation is different there.
Bro. It's the same thing in Southern california. Rural areas are red. But this red vs blue don't mean shit when the red is filled with RINOs. I've heard multiple people from san fran refer to their home as norcal, northern california, etc. Probably because they don't want to give away they're from the Anus of America
San francisco? Tf? Gay capital, USA?
Sorry, my geography is terrible friend. Never been to Cali, I'm on the opposite side of USA.
My geography has improved a bit due to learning politics, but still quite poor when it comes to knowing city placement in Cali.
Is it true that most of northern Cali is red, or is that false?
I was lead to believe that if northern Cali was it's own state, it would give its electors to a conservative, as the majority vote red.
Is this true at all, or really not so much?
You're right if you consider "Northern California" to be North of Sacramento. That's like a third of the state by landmass, and probably like 10% by population.
A Southern Californian might lump the SF Bay Area and Sacramento into "Northern California," or more likely "NorCal," but generally people from the Bay or central coast wouldn't consider themselves to be in "Northern California" as opposed to southern the same way southerners would.
There's a difference between "Northern California" and "Not Southern California."
The average Californian probably can't name a single town between Sacramento and Oregon. That's "Northern California." Sacramento is like 2/3rds the way up the state. That whole area (excluding Sacramento itself), and a lot of the inland of California, are the rural "based" areas.
Almost no one would call San Francisco "Northern California." More likely the region would be referred to as "The Bay," "The Bay Area," or "SF."
Someone might include the bay area as part of "NorCal," in the context of "As opposed to Southern California," probably in the context of universities. But the connotation is different there.
Bro. It's the same thing in Southern california. Rural areas are red. But this red vs blue don't mean shit when the red is filled with RINOs. I've heard multiple people from san fran refer to their home as norcal, northern california, etc. Probably because they don't want to give away they're from the Anus of America