I'm not playing word games. If you look up how NatSoc actually worked, it's a lot different from communism. Still too collectivist for my taste, but I'd take National Socialism over communism.

One thing that's become apparent to me is: if you have a reasonably small group of people who identify with each other and like each other and share common values, you can get away with pretty much any system you want. And if you have the opposite of that, no political system is going to save you from civil war. This is my interpretation of history.