Have to say, I'm concerned that this Super Straight thing could be inadvertently turned into a trap. Normalize the idea of not being willing to date certain women as a specific offshoot sexuality of basic heterosexuality. Force normal people to effectively declare themselves "transphobic" to remain "straight". Then everyone will either conform, or out themselves as transphobes and be cancelled/attacked/fired/exiled and so on. Fine for a lot of people on sites like this, but your average every day person that wants to be left alone might have trouble.
It'd be one more thing the left could use to interrogate people.
"What's your sexuality?"
"Straight."
"So, not Super Straight?"
"Uh. N-n-nope...just straight."
"Good answer."
Next thing you know the left has the entire standard heterosexual gender chalked up as LGBT allies, and anyone else categorized as a problematic exception. Normal straight people become a minority - on paper at least. Not in reality, but it's easy narrative control for subversion I think. Guaranteed they'll even start referring to it as the SS and associate it with nazis.
Granted, this Super Straight meme probably won't go that far, but I could see this being used as a test run. Or maybe even if this meme does grow and catch on, enough people will associate themselves with it that nothing really changes.
Probably overthinking the whole thing. Or maybe I'm underthinking it in the wrong direction 🤔?
Then everyone will either conform, or out themselves as transphobes and be cancelled/attacked/fired/exiled and so on.
If the Equality Act passes it will be illegal to discriminate against Super Straights, then we can cancel them for calling us "transphobes". That kind of hate speech doesn't belong in a civilized society.
You are overthinking it. LGBT bullcrap is temporary and small and only as useful as their corporate overlords can use it to sell shitty cookies. This is a meme and in a few months it'll lose its steam.
I think the primary difference here is that people who declare themselves super straight aren't mentally deranged like the rest of the alphabet mafia. They know that they're just doing it to poke a hole through the eyes of the gender plethora.
Normies aren't going to need to declare anything because they're followers anyway. By the time they even become aware of super straight the whole situation will probably have played out.
If it gets to the point where they're interrogating people (and I have little doubt it will, given the current course remains unchallenged) - then we're going to have much much bigger problems to deal with.
I wasn't really thinking of serious interrogations. Just using that word to refer to the lefty questioning they might do to force someone to take a stance. More commonly done to celebrities really - I don't know if they do it to ordinary people, although I have seen it on internet forums as well.
That aside, hopefully you're right and this all goes nowhere. My post is just intended to present the possible option that exists here. An option for the left to try to turn basic heterosexuality into a shamed minority (again - on paper, not in reality), identified by a lack of trans involvement. Thinking long term.
Oh it does sound stupid, which is why I said if anything, this would just be used as a test run while we all enjoy trolling the left (and I am enjoying it myself). In other words though, just like "science" got us to this clown world bullshit in the first place, you could just have big important scientists add an "official" sexualiity, classified specifically for people that refuse to date certain "women". Just like they use science to ostracize ordinary viewpoints now. Climate deniers, phobias, isms. Imagine how easily they could use a variant of what we're seeing now to further normalize trans.
All I'm saying is that it's possible. Super Straight itself probably wouldn't be the final outcome, but something along those lines.
By their logic, all of those born not to procreate, by virtue of their genes, will eventually die out. The recessive “gay gene” will be no more. While on the topic of the “gay gene”, should a mother be able to abort if her child tests positive for it? Her body her choice, right?
(I know there is no gay gene. But if they find one, how soon before they pass a bill to ban abortion on the basis of sexual orientation?)
I’m at the point now where you deserve it if you’re weak enough to be propagandized into this shit and everyone around you is another turbo faggot encouraging it.
Have to say, I'm concerned that this Super Straight thing could be inadvertently turned into a trap. Normalize the idea of not being willing to date certain women as a specific offshoot sexuality of basic heterosexuality. Force normal people to effectively declare themselves "transphobic" to remain "straight". Then everyone will either conform, or out themselves as transphobes and be cancelled/attacked/fired/exiled and so on. Fine for a lot of people on sites like this, but your average every day person that wants to be left alone might have trouble.
It'd be one more thing the left could use to interrogate people.
"What's your sexuality?" "Straight." "So, not Super Straight?" "Uh. N-n-nope...just straight." "Good answer."
Next thing you know the left has the entire standard heterosexual gender chalked up as LGBT allies, and anyone else categorized as a problematic exception. Normal straight people become a minority - on paper at least. Not in reality, but it's easy narrative control for subversion I think. Guaranteed they'll even start referring to it as the SS and associate it with nazis.
Granted, this Super Straight meme probably won't go that far, but I could see this being used as a test run. Or maybe even if this meme does grow and catch on, enough people will associate themselves with it that nothing really changes.
Probably overthinking the whole thing. Or maybe I'm underthinking it in the wrong direction 🤔?
If the Equality Act passes it will be illegal to discriminate against Super Straights, then we can cancel them for calling us "transphobes". That kind of hate speech doesn't belong in a civilized society.
You are overthinking it. LGBT bullcrap is temporary and small and only as useful as their corporate overlords can use it to sell shitty cookies. This is a meme and in a few months it'll lose its steam.
I think the primary difference here is that people who declare themselves super straight aren't mentally deranged like the rest of the alphabet mafia. They know that they're just doing it to poke a hole through the eyes of the gender plethora.
Normies aren't going to need to declare anything because they're followers anyway. By the time they even become aware of super straight the whole situation will probably have played out.
If it gets to the point where they're interrogating people (and I have little doubt it will, given the current course remains unchallenged) - then we're going to have much much bigger problems to deal with.
I wasn't really thinking of serious interrogations. Just using that word to refer to the lefty questioning they might do to force someone to take a stance. More commonly done to celebrities really - I don't know if they do it to ordinary people, although I have seen it on internet forums as well.
That aside, hopefully you're right and this all goes nowhere. My post is just intended to present the possible option that exists here. An option for the left to try to turn basic heterosexuality into a shamed minority (again - on paper, not in reality), identified by a lack of trans involvement. Thinking long term.
I hope I'm right too... I don't -think- this is a plot, simply due to their aggro reaction to it... but I also wouldn't put it past them either.
Laugh off how stupid it sounds and ask what are you even talking about
Oh it does sound stupid, which is why I said if anything, this would just be used as a test run while we all enjoy trolling the left (and I am enjoying it myself). In other words though, just like "science" got us to this clown world bullshit in the first place, you could just have big important scientists add an "official" sexualiity, classified specifically for people that refuse to date certain "women". Just like they use science to ostracize ordinary viewpoints now. Climate deniers, phobias, isms. Imagine how easily they could use a variant of what we're seeing now to further normalize trans.
All I'm saying is that it's possible. Super Straight itself probably wouldn't be the final outcome, but something along those lines.
This is a single generation problem.
Genetics takes care of thinning the herd.
Hard to "pass along" those trans and gay genes when you don't pro-create.
Super straight so I can Pro-Create!!!!
I don’t know about that. This is a social virus, not really genetics as much.
By their logic, all of those born not to procreate, by virtue of their genes, will eventually die out. The recessive “gay gene” will be no more. While on the topic of the “gay gene”, should a mother be able to abort if her child tests positive for it? Her body her choice, right?
(I know there is no gay gene. But if they find one, how soon before they pass a bill to ban abortion on the basis of sexual orientation?)
If we ever legislate abortion for a gay gene, it will be the left that does it. Remember I said it first. I want my I-told-you-so points.
I’m at the point now where you deserve it if you’re weak enough to be propagandized into this shit and everyone around you is another turbo faggot encouraging it.
It's shit test.
They're all full of shit.